GeForce MX550 vs 9600M GT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 9600M GT and GeForce MX550, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

9600M GT
2008
512 MB GDDR3, 23 Watt
0.36

MX550 outperforms 9600M GT by a whopping 3164% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1280411
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.0832.35
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameG96CTU117S
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date4 June 2008 (16 years ago)17 December 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores321024
Core clock speed120 MHz1065 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1320 MHz
Number of transistors314 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)23 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate8.00042.24
Floating-point processing power0.08 TFLOPS2.703 TFLOPS
ROPs816
TMUs1632

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceMXM-IIPCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s96 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.06.7 (6.4)
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA+7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

9600M GT 0.36
GeForce MX550 11.75
+3164%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

9600M GT 139
GeForce MX550 4517
+3150%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

9600M GT 1459
GeForce MX550 36560
+2406%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD1−2
−4500%
46
+4500%
4K0−128

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−163%
21−24
+163%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1050%
21−24
+1050%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−163%
21−24
+163%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−500%
12
+500%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−1100%
60
+1100%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−650%
30−33
+650%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−163%
21−24
+163%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−350%
9
+350%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−900%
70
+900%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−940%
52
+940%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−1171%
85−90
+1171%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−650%
30−33
+650%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−620%
35−40
+620%
World of Tanks 12−14
−1154%
160−170
+1154%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−163%
21−24
+163%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−100%
4
+100%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−557%
45−50
+557%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−740%
42
+740%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−1171%
85−90
+1171%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−3150%
65−70
+3150%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−22.2%
10−12
+22.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−575%
27−30
+575%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−600%
14−16
+600%
Valorant 5−6
−480%
27−30
+480%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2 14−16
−46.7%
21−24
+46.7%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−46.7%
21−24
+46.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−3300%
30−35
+3300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−46.7%
21−24
+46.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 0−1 10−12
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Dota 2 14−16
−46.7%
21−24
+46.7%
Valorant 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%

Full HD
Low Preset

Elden Ring 36
+0%
36
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Valorant 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Dota 2 74
+0%
74
+0%
Elden Ring 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Fortnite 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 55
+0%
55
+0%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Valorant 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Dota 2 104
+0%
104
+0%
Valorant 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Elden Ring 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
World of Tanks 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Elden Ring 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Metro Exodus 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Fortnite 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

This is how 9600M GT and GeForce MX550 compete in popular games:

  • GeForce MX550 is 4500% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the GeForce MX550 is 3300% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GeForce MX550 is ahead in 32 tests (52%)
  • there's a draw in 30 tests (48%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.36 11.75
Recency 4 June 2008 17 December 2021
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 23 Watt 25 Watt

9600M GT has 8.7% lower power consumption.

GeForce MX550, on the other hand, has a 3163.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 358.3% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce MX550 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9600M GT in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GT
GeForce 9600M GT
NVIDIA GeForce MX550
GeForce MX550

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 99 votes

Rate GeForce 9600M GT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 811 votes

Rate GeForce MX550 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.