Quadro FX 3700M vs GeForce 9600 GT

#ad
Buy
VS
#ad
Buy

Combined performance score

9600 GT
1.26
+6.8%

GeForce 9600 GT outperforms Quadro FX 3700M by 7% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking9951022
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money0.030.05
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)G9x (2007−2010)
GPU code nameG94NB9E-GLM3
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date21 February 2008 (16 years old)14 August 2008 (15 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)$179 $925
Current price$141 (0.8x MSRP)$163 (0.2x MSRP)
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

FX 3700M has 67% better value for money than 9600 GT.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores64128
CUDA cores64no data
Core clock speed650 MHz550 MHz
Number of transistors505 million754 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)96 Watt75 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature105 °Cno data
Texture fill rate20.8 billion/sec35.20
Floating-point performance208 gflops352.0 gflops

Size and compatibility

Information on GeForce 9600 GT and Quadro FX 3700M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Bus support16x PCI-E 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16MXM-HE
Length9" (22.9 cm)no data
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors6-pinno data
SLI options+no data

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount512 MB1 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth57.6 GB/s51.2 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsHDTVTwo Dual Link DVINo outputs
Multi monitor support+no data
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIS/PDIFno data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model4.04.0
OpenGL2.13.3
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA++

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

9600 GT 1.26
+6.8%
FX 3700M 1.18

GeForce 9600 GT outperforms Quadro FX 3700M by 7% in our combined benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

9600 GT 489
+7.2%
FX 3700M 456

GeForce 9600 GT outperforms Quadro FX 3700M by 7% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 1.26 1.18
Recency 21 February 2008 14 August 2008
Cost $179 $925
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 1 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 96 Watt 75 Watt

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9600 GT and Quadro FX 3700M. The differences in performance seem too small.

Be aware that GeForce 9600 GT is a desktop card while Quadro FX 3700M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT
GeForce 9600 GT
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M
Quadro FX 3700M

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 1821 vote

Rate NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.