Radeon RX Vega Mobile vs GeForce 8800 GT Mac Edition

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Vega (2017−2020)
GPU code nameG92Vega Mobile
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1 February 2008 (17 years ago)7 January 2018 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1121792
Core clock speed600 MHzno data
Number of transistors754 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology65 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt90 Watt
Texture fill rate33.60no data
Floating-point processing power0.336 TFLOPSno data
ROPs16no data
TMUs56no data
L2 Cache64 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16no data
Length229 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3HBM2
Maximum RAM amount512 MB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit2048 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth57.6 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVIno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12_1
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL3.3no data
OpenCL1.1no data
VulkanN/A-
CUDA1.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 February 2008 7 January 2018
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 90 Watt

RX Vega Mobile has an age advantage of 9 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 364.3% more advanced lithography process, and 38.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 8800 GT Mac Edition and Radeon RX Vega Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 8800 GT Mac Edition is a desktop graphics card while Radeon RX Vega Mobile is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT Mac Edition
GeForce 8800 GT Mac Edition
AMD Radeon RX Vega Mobile
Radeon RX Vega Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.1 12 votes

Rate GeForce 8800 GT Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 400 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8800 GT Mac Edition or Radeon RX Vega Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.