GeForce MX330 vs 9600 GT

Place in performance ranking	999	544
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.03	3.33
Architecture	Tesla (2006−2010)	Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code name	G94	N17S-LP / N17S-G3
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	21 February 2008 (16 years ago)	20 February 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$179	no data
Current price	$141 (0.8x MSRP)	$1079

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GeForce MX330 has 11000% better value for money than 9600 GT.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	64	384
CUDA cores	64	no data
Core clock speed	650 MHz	1531 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1594 MHz
Number of transistors	505 million	1,800 million
Manufacturing process technology	65 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	96 Watt	25 Watt (12 - 25 Watt TGP)
Maximum GPU temperature	105 °C	no data
Texture fill rate	20.8 billion/sec	38.26
Floating-point performance	208 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce 9600 GT and GeForce MX330 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Bus support	16x PCI-E 2.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	9" (22.9 cm)	no data
Height	4.376" (11.1 cm)	no data
Width	1-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	6-pin	None
SLI options	+	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	2 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	900 MHz	7000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	57.6 GB/s	48.06 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	HDTVTwo Dual Link DVI	No outputs
Multi monitor support	+	no data
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536	no data
Audio input for HDMI	S/PDIF	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus

no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.1 (10_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	4.0	6.4
OpenGL	2.1	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.2.131
CUDA	+	6.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

9600 GT 1.26

GeForce MX330 6.33
+402%

MX330 outperforms 9600 GT by 402% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

9600 GT 487

GeForce MX330 2443
+402%

MX330 outperforms 9600 GT by 402% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	4−5 −450%	22 +450%
4K	4−5 −500%	24 +500%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

1−2

−900%

10−11
+900%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −533%	19 +533%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −800%	9 +800%
Battlefield 5	3−4 −500%	18−20 +500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −450%	11 +450%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −900%	10−11 +900%
Far Cry 5	4−5 −425%	21 +425%
Far Cry New Dawn	5−6 −440%	27 +440%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 −417%	31 +417%
Hitman 3	3−4 −433%	16 +433%
Horizon Zero Dawn	7−8 −457%	39 +457%
Metro Exodus	5−6 −440%	27 +440%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 −420%	26 +420%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −425%	21−24 +425%
Watch Dogs: Legion	2−3 −600%	14 +600%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 −600%	14 +600%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −700%	8 +700%
Battlefield 5	3−4 −500%	18−20 +500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1−2 −900%	10 +900%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −900%	10−11 +900%
Far Cry 5	3−4 −500%	18 +500%
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4 −533%	19 +533%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 −500%	30−33 +500%
Hitman 3	2−3 −500%	12 +500%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 −405%	106 +405%
Metro Exodus	3−4 −467%	17 +467%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 −425%	21 +425%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −425%	21−24 +425%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	3−4 −533%	19 +533%
Watch Dogs: Legion	14−16 −436%	75 +436%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −600%	7 +600%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −600%	7−8 +600%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	0−1	4
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −900%	10−11 +900%
Far Cry 5	2−3 −500%	12 +500%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 −433%	16 +433%
Horizon Zero Dawn	3−4 −433%	16 +433%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −425%	21−24 +425%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	2−3 −500%	12 +500%
Watch Dogs: Legion	5−6 −420%	24−27 +420%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

1−2

−800%

9
+800%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	2−3 −500%	12−14 +500%
Far Cry New Dawn	1−2 −800%	9−10 +800%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −500%	6−7 +500%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	1−2
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1−2 −700%	8−9 +700%
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	3−4
Far Cry 5	1−2 −900%	10−11 +900%
Forza Horizon 4	2−3 −450%	10−12 +450%
Hitman 3	1−2 −900%	10−11 +900%
Horizon Zero Dawn	2−3 −600%	14−16 +600%
Metro Exodus	1−2 −500%	6−7 +500%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	0−1	3−4
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	0−1	5−6
Watch Dogs: Legion	0−1	3−4

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3
−450%

10−12

+450%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	0−1	5−6
Far Cry New Dawn	0−1	4−5
Hitman 3	0−1	2−3
Horizon Zero Dawn	1−2 −500%	6−7 +500%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	0−1	2−3
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	0−1	3−4

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	0−1	4−5
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	3−4
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	0−1	3−4
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	0−1
Far Cry 5	0−1	3−4
Forza Horizon 4	1−2 −500%	6−7 +500%
Horizon Zero Dawn	1−2 −500%	6−7 +500%
Metro Exodus	1−2 −600%	7−8 +600%
Watch Dogs: Legion	0−1	2−3

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

1−2

−600%

7−8
+600%

This is how 9600 GT and GeForce MX330 compete in popular games:

GeForce MX330 is 450% faster in 1080p
GeForce MX330 is 500% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	1.26	6.33
Recency	21 February 2008	20 February 2020
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	2 GB
Chip lithography	65 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	96 Watt	25 Watt