Radeon RX 6700 vs GeForce 9600 GSO

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 9600 GSO and Radeon RX 6700, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

9600 GSO
2008
384 MB GDDR3, 105 Watt
0.76

RX 6700 outperforms 9600 GSO by a whopping 5783% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking120592
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.09no data
Power efficiency0.7019.79
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameG92Navi 22
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date28 April 2008 (17 years ago)9 June 2021 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$49.99 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores962304
Core clock speed550 MHz1941 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2450 MHz
Number of transistors754 million17,200 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)105 Watt175 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature105 °Cno data
Texture fill rate26.40352.8
Floating-point processing power0.264 TFLOPS11.29 TFLOPS
ROPs1264
TMUs48144
Ray Tracing Coresno data36
L0 Cacheno data576 KB
L1 Cacheno data512 KB
L2 Cache48 KB3 MB
L3 Cacheno data80 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI-E 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length229 mm267 mm
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin1x 8-pin
SLI options2-way-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount384 MB10 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit160 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth38.4 GB/s320.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsDual Link DVIHDTV1x HDMI 2.1, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a, 1x USB Type-C
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI++
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIS/PDIFno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.5
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCL1.12.1
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

9600 GSO 0.76
RX 6700 44.71
+5783%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

9600 GSO 323
Samples: 252
RX 6700 18921
+5758%
Samples: 1712

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.76 44.71
Recency 28 April 2008 9 June 2021
Maximum RAM amount 384 MB 10 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 105 Watt 175 Watt

9600 GSO has 66.7% lower power consumption.

RX 6700, on the other hand, has a 5782.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, a 2566.7% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 828.6% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6700 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9600 GSO in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO
GeForce 9600 GSO
AMD Radeon RX 6700
Radeon RX 6700

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 68 votes

Rate GeForce 9600 GSO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 1549 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9600 GSO or Radeon RX 6700, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.