Quadro FX 3400 vs GeForce 9600 GSO

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1128not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.09no data
Power efficiency0.70no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameG92NV45
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date28 April 2008 (16 years ago)28 June 2004 (20 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$49.99 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96no data
Core clock speed550 MHz350 MHz
Number of transistors754 million222 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)105 Watt101 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature105 °Cno data
Texture fill rate26.405.600
Floating-point processing power0.264 TFLOPSno data
ROPs1216
TMUs4816

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI-E 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length229 mmno data
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin1x 6-pin
SLI options2-way-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount384 MB256 MB
Memory bus width192 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz450 MHz
Memory bandwidth38.4 GB/s28.8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDual Link DVIHDTV2x DVI, 1x S-Video
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIS/PDIFno data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model4.03.0
OpenGL2.12.1
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 28 April 2008 28 June 2004
Maximum RAM amount 384 MB 256 MB
Chip lithography 65 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 105 Watt 101 Watt

9600 GSO has an age advantage of 3 years, a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

FX 3400, on the other hand, has 4% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9600 GSO and Quadro FX 3400. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 9600 GSO is a desktop card while Quadro FX 3400 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO
GeForce 9600 GSO
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3400
Quadro FX 3400

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 57 votes

Rate GeForce 9600 GSO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 7 votes

Rate Quadro FX 3400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.