ATI Rage Mobility-CL vs GeForce 9600 GSO 512

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1128not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.65no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Rage 4 (1998−1999)
GPU code nameG94Rage Mobility
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date23 October 2008 (16 years ago)1 February 1999 (25 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores48no data
Core clock speed650 MHz75 MHz
Number of transistors505 million4 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm350 nm
Power consumption (TDP)90 Wattno data
Maximum GPU temperature105 °Cno data
Texture fill rate15.600.08
Floating-point processing power0.156 TFLOPSno data
ROPs161
TMUs241

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16AGP 2x
Length229 mmno data
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data
SLI options2-way-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3SDR
Maximum RAM amount512 MB8 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz70 MHz
Memory bandwidth57.6 GB/s560.0 MB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsTwo Dual Link DVIHDTV1x VGA
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIS/PDIFno data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)6.0
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL2.11.2
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 October 2008 1 February 1999
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 8 MB
Chip lithography 65 nm 350 nm

9600 GSO 512 has an age advantage of 9 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 438.5% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9600 GSO 512 and Rage Mobility-CL. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 9600 GSO 512 is a desktop card while Rage Mobility-CL is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO 512
GeForce 9600 GSO 512
ATI Rage Mobility-CL
Rage Mobility-CL

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 60 votes

Rate GeForce 9600 GSO 512 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Rage Mobility-CL on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.