FireStream 9370 vs GeForce 9500M GE

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated566
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data2.02
Architectureno dataTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameMCP79Mx + NB9MCypress
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date9 January 2008 (16 years ago)23 June 2010 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores241600
Core clock speedno data825 MHz
Number of transistorsno data2,154 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rateno data66.00
Floating-point processing powerno data2.64 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data80

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR2, GDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount256 MB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1150 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data147.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DisplayPort

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.011.2 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.0
OpenGLno data4.4
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 9 January 2008 23 June 2010
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 225 Watt

9500M GE has 800% lower power consumption.

FireStream 9370, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 62.5% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9500M GE and FireStream 9370. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 9500M GE is a notebook card while FireStream 9370 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9500M GE
GeForce 9500M GE
AMD FireStream 9370
FireStream 9370

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce 9500M GE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 8 votes

Rate FireStream 9370 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.