ATI Radeon SDR vs GeForce 9500M G

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Rage 6 (2000−2007)
GPU code nameG96Rage 6
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date3 June 2008 (16 years ago)1 June 2000 (24 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores16no data
Core clock speed500 MHz166 MHz
Number of transistors314 million30 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt23 Watt
Texture fill rate4.0001
Floating-point processing power0.04 TFLOPSno data
Gigaflops60no data
ROPs82
TMUs86

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16AGP 4x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3SDR
Maximum RAM amount512 MB32 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz166 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s2.656 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x VGA

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)7.0
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL3.31.3
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 June 2008 1 June 2000
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 32 MB
Chip lithography 65 nm 180 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 23 Watt

9500M G has an age advantage of 8 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 176.9% more advanced lithography process, and 15% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9500M G and Radeon SDR. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 9500M G is a notebook card while Radeon SDR is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9500M G
GeForce 9500M G
ATI Radeon SDR
Radeon SDR

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1 1 vote

Rate GeForce 9500M G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon SDR on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.