NVS 4200M vs GeForce 9500 GT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1172
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameG96GF119
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date29 July 2008 (16 years ago)22 February 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$85.99 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3248
CUDA cores32no data
Core clock speed550 MHz810 MHz
Number of transistors314 million292 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt25 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature105 °Cno data
Texture fill rate9.6006.480
Floating-point processing power0.096 gflops0.1555 gflops
ROPs84
TMUs168

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16MXM
Length175 mmno data
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR3
Maximum RAM amount1 GB1 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed800 (GDDR3) and 500 (DDR2) MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 (GDDR3) and 16.0 (DDR2)12.8 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDual Link DVISingle Link DVINo outputs
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIS/PDIFno data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model4.05.1
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+2.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

9500 GT 163
NVS 4200M 278
+70.6%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 29 July 2008 22 February 2011
Chip lithography 65 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 25 Watt

NVS 4200M has an age advantage of 2 years, a 62.5% more advanced lithography process, and 100% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9500 GT and NVS 4200M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 9500 GT is a desktop card while NVS 4200M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT
GeForce 9500 GT
NVIDIA NVS 4200M
NVS 4200M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 1171 vote

Rate GeForce 9500 GT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 127 votes

Rate NVS 4200M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.