Radeon RX 6650M XT vs GeForce 9500 GS Rev. 2

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated82
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data25.71
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameG96CNavi 23
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date29 July 2008 (16 years ago)4 January 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores322048
Core clock speed500 MHz2068 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2416 MHz
Number of transistors314 million11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt120 Watt
Texture fill rate8.000309.2
Floating-point processing power0.08 TFLOPS9.896 TFLOPS
ROPs864
TMUs16128
Ray Tracing Coresno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed500 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth16 GB/s256.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.5
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.12.1
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA1.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 29 July 2008 4 January 2022
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 120 Watt

9500 GS Rev. 2 has 200% lower power consumption.

RX 6650M XT, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 13 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 685.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9500 GS Rev. 2 and Radeon RX 6650M XT. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 9500 GS Rev. 2 is a desktop card while Radeon RX 6650M XT is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GS Rev. 2
GeForce 9500 GS Rev. 2
AMD Radeon RX 6650M XT
Radeon RX 6650M XT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce 9500 GS Rev. 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 59 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6650M XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.