Intel HD Graphics 630 vs NVIDIA GeForce 940M

#ad
Buy
VS
#ad
Buy

Combined performance score

GeForce 940M
2.90

HD Graphics 630 outperforms GeForce 940M by 7% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking743715
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money0.120.08
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2018)Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake (2015−2017)
GPU code nameN16S-GT-S/BKaby-Lake-H-GT2
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date12 March 2015 (9 years old)1 January 2017 (7 years old)
Current price$879 $370
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GeForce 940M has 50% better value for money than HD Graphics 630.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38424
Core clock speed1072 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1176 MHz1150 MHz
Number of transistors1,870 million189 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate28.2226.40
Floating-point performance903.2 gflops441.6 gflops

Size and compatibility

Information on GeForce 940M and HD Graphics 630 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x1
Widthno dataIGP

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3DDR3L/LPDDR3/LPDDR4
Maximum RAM amount4 GB64 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit64/128 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GPU Boost2.0no data
Optimus+no data
GameWorks+no data
Quick Syncno data+

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.22.1
Vulkan1.1.126+
CUDA+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GeForce 940M 2.90
HD Graphics 630 3.09
+6.6%

HD Graphics 630 outperforms GeForce 940M by 7% in our combined benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GeForce 940M 1123
HD Graphics 630 1197
+6.6%

HD Graphics 630 outperforms GeForce 940M by 7% in Passmark.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GeForce 940M 7531
HD Graphics 630 7685
+2.1%

HD Graphics 630 outperforms GeForce 940M by 2% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GeForce 940M 2406
+39.1%
HD Graphics 630 1729

GeForce 940M outperforms HD Graphics 630 by 39% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GeForce 940M 1622
+52%
HD Graphics 630 1067

GeForce 940M outperforms HD Graphics 630 by 52% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GeForce 940M 8819
HD Graphics 630 9715
+10.2%

HD Graphics 630 outperforms GeForce 940M by 10% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 8%

GeForce 940M 123311
+21.9%
HD Graphics 630 101178

GeForce 940M outperforms HD Graphics 630 by 22% in 3DMark Ice Storm GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD19
+26.7%
15
−26.7%
1440p96
+50%
64
−50%
4K20
+53.8%
13
−53.8%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−25%
5
+25%
Battlefield 5 17
+143%
7−8
−143%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
−8.3%
12−14
+8.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Far Cry 5 11
+83.3%
6
−83.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 11
+120%
5
−120%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Hitman 3 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%
Horizon Zero Dawn 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10
+100%
5
−100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Battlefield 5 13
+85.7%
7−8
−85.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
−8.3%
12−14
+8.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Far Cry 5 10
+100%
5−6
−100%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Hitman 3 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%
Horizon Zero Dawn 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Metro Exodus 2
+0%
2
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Battlefield 5 11
+57.1%
7−8
−57.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Far Cry 5 10
+100%
5−6
−100%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Hitman 3 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Metro Exodus 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 1−2
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Hitman 3 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 2
−100%
4−5
+100%
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

This is how GeForce 940M and HD Graphics 630 compete in popular games:

1080p resolution:

  • GeForce 940M is 26.7% faster than HD Graphics 630

1440p resolution:

  • GeForce 940M is 50% faster than HD Graphics 630

4K resolution:

  • GeForce 940M is 53.8% faster than HD Graphics 630

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Battlefield 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GeForce 940M is 143% faster than the HD Graphics 630.
  • in Far Cry 5, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the HD Graphics 630 is 100% faster than the GeForce 940M.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GeForce 940M is ahead in 9 tests (17%)
  • HD Graphics 630 is ahead in 11 tests (21%)
  • there's a draw in 33 tests (62%)

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 2.90 3.09
Recency 12 March 2015 1 January 2017
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 64 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 15 Watt

We couldn't decide between GeForce 940M and HD Graphics 630. The differences in performance seem too small.

Be aware that GeForce 940M is a notebook card while HD Graphics 630 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 940M
GeForce 940M
Intel HD Graphics 630
HD Graphics 630

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 619 votes

Rate NVIDIA GeForce 940M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 1039 votes

Rate Intel HD Graphics 630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.