A100 SXM4 80 GB vs GeForce 9400M

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameC79GA100
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date15 October 2008 (16 years ago)16 November 2020 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores166912
Core clock speed580 MHz1095 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1410 MHz
Number of transistors314 million54,200 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)12 Watt400 Watt
Texture fill rate4.640609.1
Floating-point processing power0.0448 TFLOPS19.49 TFLOPS
ROPs4160
TMUs8432
Tensor Coresno data432

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
WidthIGPIGP
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedHBM2e
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared80 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared5120 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1593 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data2,039 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)N/A
Shader Model4.0N/A
OpenGL3.3N/A
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-8.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 October 2008 16 November 2020
Chip lithography 65 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 400 Watt

GeForce 9400M has 3233.3% lower power consumption.

A100 SXM4 80 GB, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 12 years, and a 828.6% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9400M and A100 SXM4 80 GB. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 9400M is a desktop card while A100 SXM4 80 GB is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9400M
GeForce 9400M
NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB
A100 SXM4 80 GB

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 44 votes

Rate GeForce 9400M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 58 votes

Rate A100 SXM4 80 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.