ATI Radeon X1950 PRO vs GeForce 9400M GeForceBoost

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1417
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data0.32
Architectureno dataR500 (2005−2007)
GPU code nameno dataRV570
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date3 June 2008 (17 years ago)1 October 2006 (19 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores24no data
Core clock speedno data575 MHz
Number of transistorsno data330 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data66 Watt
Texture fill rateno data6.900
ROPsno data12
TMUsno data12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 1.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountno data256 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speedno data690 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data44.16 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX109.0c (9_3)
Shader Modelno data3.0
OpenGLno data2.0
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 June 2008 1 October 2006
Chip lithography 65 nm 80 nm

9400M GeForceBoost has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 23.1% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9400M GeForceBoost and Radeon X1950 PRO. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 9400M GeForceBoost is a notebook graphics card while Radeon X1950 PRO is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9400M GeForceBoost
GeForce 9400M GeForceBoost
ATI Radeon X1950 PRO
Radeon X1950 PRO

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 15 votes

Rate GeForce 9400M GeForceBoost on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 156 votes

Rate Radeon X1950 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9400M GeForceBoost or Radeon X1950 PRO, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.