ATI Radeon X1950 PRO vs GeForce 9800M GTX SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 9800M GTX SLI with Radeon X1950 PRO, including specs and performance data.

9800M GTX SLI
2008
1 GB GDDR3, 150 Watt
2.86
+959%

9800M SLI outperforms X1950 PRO by a whopping 959% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking8291411
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.460.31
ArchitectureG9x (2007−2010)R500 (2005−2007)
GPU code nameNB9E-GTXRV570
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date15 July 2008 (17 years ago)1 October 2006 (19 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores224no data
Core clock speed500 MHz575 MHz
Number of transistors3016 Million330 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt66 Watt
Texture fill rateno data6.900
ROPsno data12
TMUsno data12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 1.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount1 GB256 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz690 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data44.16 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX109.0c (9_3)
Shader Modelno data3.0
OpenGLno data2.0
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 9−10 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9 0−1

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 10−11 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 9−10 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7 0−1
Far Cry 5 8−9 0−1
Fortnite 14−16
+1400%
1−2
−1400%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+1300%
1−2
−1300%
Forza Horizon 5 7−8 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+1200%
1−2
−1200%
Valorant 45−50
+1050%
4−5
−1050%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 10−11 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 9−10 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 55−60
+1000%
5−6
−1000%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7 0−1
Dota 2 27−30
+1300%
2−3
−1300%
Far Cry 5 8−9 0−1
Fortnite 14−16
+1400%
1−2
−1400%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+1300%
1−2
−1300%
Forza Horizon 5 7−8 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 7−8 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9 0−1
Metro Exodus 5−6 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+1200%
1−2
−1200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11 0−1
Valorant 45−50
+1050%
4−5
−1050%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 10−11 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7 0−1
Dota 2 27−30
+1300%
2−3
−1300%
Far Cry 5 8−9 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+1300%
1−2
−1300%
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+1200%
1−2
−1200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11 0−1
Valorant 45−50
+1050%
4−5
−1050%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 14−16
+1400%
1−2
−1400%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 6−7 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 21−24
+1000%
2−3
−1000%
Metro Exodus 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
+1200%
2−3
−1200%
Valorant 24−27
+1200%
2−3
−1200%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Far Cry 5 5−6 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 7−8 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 3−4 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5 0−1

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 5−6 0−1

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+1400%
1−2
−1400%
Valorant 14−16
+1300%
1−2
−1300%

4K
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 8−9 0−1
Far Cry 5 2−3 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 2−3 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4 0−1

4K
Epic

Fortnite 3−4 0−1

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.86 0.27
Recency 15 July 2008 1 October 2006
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 65 nm 80 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 66 Watt

9800M GTX SLI has a 959.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 23.1% more advanced lithography process.

ATI X1950 PRO, on the other hand, has 127.3% lower power consumption.

The GeForce 9800M GTX SLI is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon X1950 PRO in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 9800M GTX SLI is a notebook graphics card while Radeon X1950 PRO is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTX SLI
GeForce 9800M GTX SLI
ATI Radeon X1950 PRO
Radeon X1950 PRO

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 13 votes

Rate GeForce 9800M GTX SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 156 votes

Rate Radeon X1950 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9800M GTX SLI or Radeon X1950 PRO, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.