ATI Radeon X1950 PRO vs GeForce 9400M G

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 9400M G with Radeon X1950 PRO, including specs and performance data.

9400M G
2008
12 Watt
0.15

X1950 PRO outperforms 9400M G by an impressive 67% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking14701402
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.010.31
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)R500 (2005−2007)
GPU code nameC79RV570
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date15 October 2008 (17 years ago)1 October 2006 (19 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores16no data
Core clock speed450 MHz575 MHz
Number of transistors314 million330 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)12 Watt66 Watt
Texture fill rate3.6006.900
Floating-point processing power0.0352 TFLOPSno data
ROPs412
TMUs812

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared256 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared690 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data44.16 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model4.03.0
OpenGL3.32.0
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

9400M G 0.15
ATI X1950 PRO 0.25
+66.7%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

9400M G 67
Samples: 113
ATI X1950 PRO 112
+67.2%
Samples: 116

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.15 0.25
Recency 15 October 2008 1 October 2006
Chip lithography 65 nm 80 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 66 Watt

9400M G has an age advantage of 2 years, a 23.1% more advanced lithography process, and 450% lower power consumption.

ATI X1950 PRO, on the other hand, has a 66.7% higher aggregate performance score.

The Radeon X1950 PRO is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9400M G in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 9400M G is a notebook graphics card while Radeon X1950 PRO is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9400M G
GeForce 9400M G
ATI Radeon X1950 PRO
Radeon X1950 PRO

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 6 votes

Rate GeForce 9400M G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 148 votes

Rate Radeon X1950 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9400M G or Radeon X1950 PRO, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.