RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile vs GeForce 9400M GeForceBoost
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | 119 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Architecture | no data | Ada Lovelace |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 3 June 2008 (16 years ago) | 21 March 2023 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 24 | 3072 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 115 Watt (35 - 115 Watt TGP) |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on GeForce 9400M GeForceBoost and RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
| Laptop size | no data | large |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | no data | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | no data | 8 GB |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | no data | 16000 MHz |
| Shared memory | - | - |
API compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 10 | 12 Ultimate |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
3DMark Vantage Performance
3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.
Benchmark coverage: 17%
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile outperforms GeForce 9400M GeForceBoost by 30175% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 3 June 2008 | 21 March 2023 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 5 nm |
We couldn't decide between GeForce 9400M GeForceBoost and RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
