ATI M9 vs GeForce 9400M GeForceBoost
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Architecture | no data | Rage 7 (2001−2006) |
| GPU code name | no data | M9 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 3 June 2008 (16 years ago) | no data |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 24 | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 36 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 150 nm |
| ROPs | no data | 4 |
| TMUs | no data | 4 |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | no data |
| Shared memory | - | no data |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 10 | 8.1 |
| OpenGL | no data | 1.4 |
| OpenCL | no data | N/A |
| Vulkan | - | N/A |
Pros & cons summary
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 150 nm |
9400M GeForceBoost has a 130.8% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between GeForce 9400M GeForceBoost and M9. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that GeForce 9400M GeForceBoost is a notebook card while M9 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
