UHD Graphics 750 vs GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE)

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE) with UHD Graphics 750, including specs and performance data.

9400M (G) / ION (LE)
2008
12 Watt
0.29

Graphics 750 outperforms 9400M (G) / ION (LE) by a whopping 1328% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1386722
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.8621.20
Architectureno dataGeneration 12.1 (2020−2021)
GPU code nameMCP79MXRocket Lake GT1
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date14 October 2008 (17 years ago)30 March 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores16256
Core clock speed450 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1300 MHz
Number of transistors282 Millionno data
Manufacturing process technology65 nm14 nm+++
Power consumption (TDP)12 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rateno data20.80
Floating-point processing powerno data0.6656 TFLOPS
ROPsno data8
TMUsno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataRing Bus
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountno dataSystem Shared
Memory bus widthno dataSystem Shared
Memory clock speedno dataSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.012 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−800%
9−10
+800%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−800%
9−10
+800%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−567%
20−22
+567%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−143%
16−18
+143%
Valorant 24−27
−115%
55−60
+115%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 12−14
−469%
70−75
+469%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−800%
9−10
+800%
Dota 2 9−10
−1233%
120−130
+1233%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−567%
20−22
+567%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−143%
16−18
+143%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−140%
12−14
+140%
Valorant 24−27
−115%
55−60
+115%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−800%
9−10
+800%
Dota 2 9−10
−1233%
120−130
+1233%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−567%
20−22
+567%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−143%
16−18
+143%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−140%
12−14
+140%
Valorant 24−27
−115%
55−60
+115%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−167%
8−9
+167%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 0−1 30−35
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
−1000%
30−35
+1000%

1440p
Ultra

Escape from Tarkov 2−3
−300%
8−9
+300%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−14.3%
16−18
+14.3%
Valorant 2−3
−950%
21−24
+950%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Fortnite 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Fortnite 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Metro Exodus 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

1440p
High

Grand Theft Auto V 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Metro Exodus 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Valorant 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the UHD Graphics 750 is 1000% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics 750 performs better in 25 tests (45%)
  • there's a draw in 30 tests (55%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.29 4.14
Recency 14 October 2008 30 March 2021
Chip lithography 65 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 15 Watt

9400M (G) / ION (LE) has 25% lower power consumption.

UHD Graphics 750, on the other hand, has a 1327.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.

The UHD Graphics 750 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE) in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE) is a notebook graphics card while UHD Graphics 750 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE)
GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE)
Intel UHD Graphics 750
UHD Graphics 750

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 38 votes

Rate GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 428 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE) or UHD Graphics 750, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.