Quadro 4100 vs GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1318not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.80no data
Architectureno dataKepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameMCP79MXGK104
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date14 October 2008 (16 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores161344
Core clock speed450 MHz797 MHz
Number of transistors282 Million3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)12 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rateno data89.26
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data112

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data160 mm
Widthno data1-slot

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataDDR3
Maximum RAM amountno data2 GB
Memory bus widthno data256 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1782 MBps
Memory bandwidthno data57.02 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.012 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data6.5 (5.1)
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.2.175
CUDA-3.0

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 65 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 35 Watt

9400M (G) / ION (LE) has 191.7% lower power consumption.

Quadro 4100, on the other hand, has a 132.1% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE) and Quadro 4100. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE) is a notebook card while Quadro 4100 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE)
GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE)
NVIDIA Quadro 4100
Quadro 4100

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 37 votes

Rate GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 5 votes

Rate Quadro 4100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.