Radeon 625 vs GeForce 930MX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 930MX and Radeon 625, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GeForce 930MX
2016
2 GB DDR3, GDDR5, 17 Watt
3.34
+19.7%

930MX outperforms 625 by a significant 20% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking749808
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency13.473.83
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameGM108Polaris 24
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 March 2016 (8 years ago)13 May 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384384
Core clock speed952 MHz730 MHz
Boost clock speed1020 MHz1024 MHz
Number of transistorsno data1,550 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)17 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate24.4824.58
Floating-point processing power0.7834 TFLOPS0.7864 TFLOPS
ROPs88
TMUs2424

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3, GDDR5DDR3
Maximum RAM amount2 GB2 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s14.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GPU Boost2.0no data
Optimus+-
GameWorks+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model5.16.3
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.2.131
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GeForce 930MX 3.34
+19.7%
Radeon 625 2.79

  • Passmark

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce 930MX 1284
+19.7%
Radeon 625 1073

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD16
+33.3%
12−14
−33.3%

FPS performance in popular games

  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • Full HD
    Epic Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    Epic Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    Epic Preset
Atomic Heart 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
Atomic Heart 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Battlefield 5 15
+87.5%
8−9
−87.5%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
Far Cry 5 11
+120%
5−6
−120%
Fortnite 37
+185%
12−14
−185%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+15.4%
12−14
−15.4%
Forza Horizon 5 10
+150%
4−5
−150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 17
+30.8%
12−14
−30.8%
Valorant 45−50
+9.1%
40−45
−9.1%
Atomic Heart 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Battlefield 5 12
+50%
8−9
−50%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 55−60
+16%
50−55
−16%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
Dota 2 36
+38.5%
24−27
−38.5%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Fortnite 15
+15.4%
12−14
−15.4%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+15.4%
12−14
−15.4%
Forza Horizon 5 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Grand Theft Auto V 12
+71.4%
7−8
−71.4%
Metro Exodus 2
−100%
4−5
+100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 15
+15.4%
12−14
−15.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10
+25%
8−9
−25%
Valorant 45−50
+9.1%
40−45
−9.1%
Battlefield 5 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
Dota 2 33
+26.9%
24−27
−26.9%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+15.4%
12−14
−15.4%
Forza Horizon 5 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9
−44.4%
12−14
+44.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6
−33.3%
8−9
+33.3%
Valorant 45−50
+9.1%
40−45
−9.1%
Fortnite 16−18
+30.8%
12−14
−30.8%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 21−24
+21.1%
18−20
−21.1%
Grand Theft Auto V 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Metro Exodus 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
+20%
20−22
−20%
Valorant 30−35
+29.2%
24−27
−29.2%
Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
Forza Horizon 5 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Fortnite 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Atomic Heart 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+6.7%
14−16
−6.7%
Valorant 16−18
+23.1%
12−14
−23.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Fortnite 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%

This is how GeForce 930MX and Radeon 625 compete in popular games:

  • GeForce 930MX is 33% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Fortnite, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GeForce 930MX is 185% faster.
  • in Metro Exodus, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Radeon 625 is 100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GeForce 930MX is ahead in 48 tests (81%)
  • Radeon 625 is ahead in 3 tests (5%)
  • there's a draw in 8 tests (14%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.34 2.79
Recency 1 March 2016 13 May 2019
Power consumption (TDP) 17 Watt 50 Watt

GeForce 930MX has a 19.7% higher aggregate performance score, and 194.1% lower power consumption.

Radeon 625, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years.

The GeForce 930MX is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 625 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 930MX
GeForce 930MX
AMD Radeon 625
Radeon 625

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2
419 votes

Rate GeForce 930MX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3
146 votes

Rate Radeon 625 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 930MX or Radeon 625, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.