ATI FirePro M7740 vs Quadro M600M

Place in the ranking	608	870
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	12.95	2.47
Architecture	Maxwell (2014−2017)	TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code name	GM107	M97
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Mobile workstation
Release date	18 August 2015 (9 years ago)	4 August 2009 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	384	640
Core clock speed	837 MHz	650 MHz
Boost clock speed	876 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	1,870 million	826 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	30 Watt	60 Watt
Texture fill rate	14.02	20.80
Floating-point processing power	0.6728 TFLOPS	0.832 TFLOPS
ROPs	8	16
TMUs	16	32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	large
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	1 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1253 MHz	846 MHz
Memory bandwidth	80 GB/s	54.14 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Display Port	1.2	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus	+	-
3D Vision Pro	+	no data
Mosaic	+	no data
nView Display Management	+	no data
Optimus	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12	10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model	5.1	4.1
OpenGL	4.5	3.3
OpenCL	1.2	1.1
Vulkan	+	N/A
CUDA	5.0	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro M600M 5.43
+162%

ATI M7740 2.07

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Quadro M600M 12734
+92.2%

ATI M7740 6626

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

19
+171%

7−8

−171%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	14−16 +40%	10−11 −40%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 +100%	6−7 −100%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	16−18 +325%	4−5 −325%
Counter-Strike 2	14−16 +40%	10−11 −40%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 +100%	6−7 −100%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 +109%	10−12 −109%
Forza Horizon 5	12−14	0−1
Metro Exodus	14−16 +367%	3−4 −367%
Red Dead Redemption 2	16−18 +88.9%	9−10 −88.9%
Valorant	18−20 +200%	6−7 −200%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	16−18 +325%	4−5 −325%
Counter-Strike 2	14−16 +40%	10−11 −40%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 +100%	6−7 −100%
Dota 2	18−20 +280%	5−6 −280%
Far Cry 5	27−30 +92.9%	14−16 −92.9%
Fortnite	30−35 +200%	10−12 −200%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 +109%	10−12 −109%
Forza Horizon 5	12−14	0−1
Grand Theft Auto V	18−20 +280%	5−6 −280%
Metro Exodus	14−16 +367%	3−4 −367%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	45−50 +124%	21−24 −124%
Red Dead Redemption 2	16−18 +88.9%	9−10 −88.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20 +100%	9−10 −100%
Valorant	18−20 +200%	6−7 −200%
World of Tanks	90−95 +122%	40−45 −122%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	16−18 +325%	4−5 −325%
Counter-Strike 2	14−16 +40%	10−11 −40%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 +100%	6−7 −100%
Dota 2	18−20 +280%	5−6 −280%
Far Cry 5	27−30 +92.9%	14−16 −92.9%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 +109%	10−12 −109%
Forza Horizon 5	12−14	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	45−50 +124%	21−24 −124%
Valorant	18−20 +200%	6−7 −200%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	6−7	0−1
Grand Theft Auto V	6−7	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	35−40 +133%	14−16 −133%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
World of Tanks	40−45 +193%	14−16 −193%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	9−10 +800%	1−2 −800%
Counter-Strike 2	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 +66.7%	3−4 −66.7%
Far Cry 5	12−14 +100%	6−7 −100%
Forza Horizon 4	10−11 +233%	3−4 −233%
Forza Horizon 5	8−9 +300%	2−3 −300%
Metro Exodus	6−7 +200%	2−3 −200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	8−9 +60%	5−6 −60%
Valorant	14−16 +87.5%	8−9 −87.5%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	10−12 +22.2%	9−10 −22.2%
Dota 2	16−18 +6.3%	16−18 −6.3%
Grand Theft Auto V	16−18 +13.3%	14−16 −13.3%
Metro Exodus	1−2	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	16−18 +167%	6−7 −167%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 +13.3%	14−16 −13.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
Counter-Strike 2	10−12 +22.2%	9−10 −22.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Dota 2	16−18 +6.3%	16−18 −6.3%
Far Cry 5	6−7 +200%	2−3 −200%
Fortnite	5−6	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
Forza Horizon 5	3−4	0−1
Valorant	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%

This is how Quadro M600M and ATI M7740 compete in popular games:

Quadro M600M is 171% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Battlefield 5, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Quadro M600M is 800% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Quadro M600M is ahead in 49 tests (98%)
there's a draw in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	5.43	2.07
Recency	18 August 2015	4 August 2009
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	1 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	30 Watt	60 Watt

Quadro M600M has a 162.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 42.9% more advanced lithography process, and 100% lower power consumption.

The Quadro M600M is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro M7740 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.