UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) vs GeForce 9300M GS

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
9200M GS 9200M GS GDDR3 9300M GS 9300M GS DDR2 9300M GS GDDR3 G 103M G103M
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
(Jasper Lake 16 EU) (Jasper Lake 24 EU) (Jasper Lake 32 EU) G1 G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) G4 G7 P630 Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) Xe 750 32EUs Xe G4 48EUs

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 9300M GS and UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU), covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

9300M GS
2008
256 MB GDDR3, 13 Watt
0.28

Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) outperforms 9300M GS by a whopping 639% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
9300M GS 9300M GS
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU)

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1396918
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.6816.11
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Gen. 11 (2021)
GPU code nameG98Gen. 11
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date4 June 2008 (17 years ago)11 January 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores824
Core clock speed550 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speedno data800 MHz
Number of transistors210 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology65 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)13 Watt4.8 - 10 Watt
Texture fill rate4.400no data
Floating-point processing power0.0224 TFLOPSno data
Gigaflops34no data
ROPs4no data
TMUs8no data
L2 Cache16 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-Ino data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3no data
Maximum RAM amount256 MBno data
Memory bus width64 Bitno data
Memory clock speed700 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth11.2 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12_1
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL3.3no data
OpenCL1.1no data
VulkanN/A-
CUDA+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD1−2
−1200%
13
+1200%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−267%
10−12
+267%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−57.1%
10−12
+57.1%
Valorant 24−27
−60%
40−45
+60%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 12−14
−231%
40−45
+231%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Dota 2 9−10
−88.9%
17
+88.9%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−267%
10−12
+267%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−57.1%
10−12
+57.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−60%
8
+60%
Valorant 24−27
−60%
40−45
+60%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Dota 2 9−10
−77.8%
16
+77.8%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−267%
10−12
+267%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−57.1%
10−12
+57.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+25%
4
−25%
Valorant 24−27
−60%
40−45
+60%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
−600%
21−24
+600%

1440p
Ultra

Escape from Tarkov 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−7.1%
14−16
+7.1%
Valorant 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Fortnite 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Fortnite 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Metro Exodus 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

4K
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

This is how 9300M GS and UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) compete in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) is 1200% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the 9300M GS is 25% faster.
  • in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) is 600% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • 9300M GS performs better in 1 test (2%)
  • UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) performs better in 26 tests (47%)
  • there's a draw in 28 tests (51%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 0.28 2.07
Recency 4 June 2008 11 January 2021
Chip lithography 65 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 13 Watt 4 Watt

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) has a 639.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, a 550% more advanced lithography process, and 225% lower power consumption.

The UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9300M GS in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce 9300M GS
GeForce 9300M GS
Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU)
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU)
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

9300M GS GeForce 9300M GS
vs
Go 7800 GeForce Go 7800
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU)
vs
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
9300M GS GeForce 9300M GS
vs
GT 320M GeForce GT 320M
9400M GeForceBoost 9400M GeForceBoost
vs
Tesla K40t Tesla K40t
ATI Mobility HD 3470 Mobility HD 3470
vs
ATI Mobility HD 2300 Mobility HD 2300
ION 2 ION 2
vs
T600 Mobile T600 Mobile
9300M GS 9300M GS
vs
GeForce4 Ti 4600 GeForce4 Ti 4600
9300M GS 9300M GS
vs
HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2 HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2
9300M GS 9300M GS
vs
Arc Pro A30M Arc Pro A30M
NVS 160M NVS 160M
vs
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G4 Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G4
9200M GS 9200M GS
vs
9400 GT Rev. 2 9400 GT Rev. 2
9200M GS 9200M GS
vs
ATI Mobility HD 4250 IGP Mobility HD 4250 IGP
9200M GS 9200M GS
vs
Tesla K40t Tesla K40t

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

2.3 165 votes

Rate GeForce 9300M GS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 60 votes

Rate UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9300M GS or UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU), agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.