Tesla K40t vs GeForce 9200M GS

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1378not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.80no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameG98GK110B
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date3 June 2008 (17 years ago)22 November 2013 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$7,699

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores82880
Core clock speed550 MHz745 MHz
Boost clock speedno data876 MHz
Number of transistors210 million7,080 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)13 Watt245 Watt
Texture fill rate4.400210.2
Floating-point processing power0.0224 TFLOPS5.046 TFLOPS
Gigaflops31no data
ROPs448
TMUs8240
L1 Cacheno data240 KB
L2 Cache16 KB1536 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount256 MB12 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz1502 MHz
Memory bandwidth11.2 GB/s288.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (11_1)
Shader Model4.05.1
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.1.126
CUDA+3.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 June 2008 22 November 2013
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 12 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 13 Watt 245 Watt

9200M GS has 1784.6% lower power consumption.

Tesla K40t, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, a 4700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 132.1% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9200M GS and Tesla K40t. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 9200M GS is a notebook graphics card while Tesla K40t is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS
GeForce 9200M GS
NVIDIA Tesla K40t
Tesla K40t

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 29 votes

Rate GeForce 9200M GS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Tesla K40t on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9200M GS or Tesla K40t, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.