UHD Graphics 605 vs GeForce 9300M GS
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce 9300M GS and UHD Graphics 605, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
UHD Graphics 605 outperforms 9300M GS by a whopping 354% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1359 | 1072 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 1.37 | 16.22 |
| Architecture | Tesla (2006−2010) | Generation 9.5 (2016−2020) |
| GPU code name | G98 | Gemini Lake GT1.5 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 4 June 2008 (16 years ago) | 11 December 2017 (7 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 8 | 144 |
| Core clock speed | 550 MHz | 200 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 750 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 210 million | 189 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 13 Watt | 5 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 4.400 | 13.50 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.0224 TFLOPS | 0.216 TFLOPS |
| Gigaflops | 34 | no data |
| ROPs | 4 | 3 |
| TMUs | 8 | 18 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | MXM-I | Ring Bus |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR3 | System Shared |
| Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | System Shared |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | System Shared |
| Memory clock speed | 700 MHz | System Shared |
| Memory bandwidth | 11.2 GB/s | no data |
| Shared memory | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | Portable Device Dependent |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Quick Sync | no data | + |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.3 |
| CUDA | + | - |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
3DMark Vantage Performance
3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 2−3
−450%
| 11
+450%
|
| 1440p | 5−6
−380%
| 24
+380%
|
| 4K | 3−4
−400%
| 15
+400%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 6−7
−16.7%
|
7−8
+16.7%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
−100%
|
4−5
+100%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 6−7
−16.7%
|
7−8
+16.7%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
−100%
|
4−5
+100%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 5−6
−60%
|
8−9
+60%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 4−5
−50%
|
6−7
+50%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 6−7
−16.7%
|
7−8
+16.7%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
−100%
|
4−5
+100%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 6−7
+20%
|
5
−20%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 5−6
−60%
|
8−9
+60%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 6−7
+20%
|
5
−20%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 4−5
−50%
|
6−7
+50%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 4−5
−75%
|
7−8
+75%
|
| World of Tanks | 12−14
−117%
|
24−27
+117%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 6−7
−16.7%
|
7−8
+16.7%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
−100%
|
4−5
+100%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 6−7
−66.7%
|
10−11
+66.7%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 5−6
−60%
|
8−9
+60%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 6−7
−117%
|
12−14
+117%
|
1440p
High Preset
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 1−2
−600%
|
7−8
+600%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 30−35
+0%
|
30−35
+0%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 4−5
−25%
|
5−6
+25%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
| Valorant | 4−5
−50%
|
6−7
+50%
|
4K
High Preset
| Dota 2 | 14−16
−6.7%
|
16−18
+6.7%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
| Dota 2 | 14−16
−6.7%
|
16−18
+6.7%
|
| Valorant | 0−1 | 1−2 |
Full HD
Low Preset
| Elden Ring | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
| Dota 2 | 2
+0%
|
2
+0%
|
| Elden Ring | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
| Fortnite | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
| Dota 2 | 7
+0%
|
7
+0%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| World of Tanks | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
4K
High Preset
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
4K
Ultra Preset
| Far Cry 5 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
This is how 9300M GS and UHD Graphics 605 compete in popular games:
- UHD Graphics 605 is 450% faster in 1080p
- UHD Graphics 605 is 380% faster in 1440p
- UHD Graphics 605 is 400% faster in 4K
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Far Cry 5, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the 9300M GS is 20% faster.
- in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the UHD Graphics 605 is 600% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- 9300M GS is ahead in 2 tests (5%)
- UHD Graphics 605 is ahead in 22 tests (55%)
- there's a draw in 16 tests (40%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.26 | 1.18 |
| Recency | 4 June 2008 | 11 December 2017 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 13 Watt | 5 Watt |
UHD Graphics 605 has a 353.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 364.3% more advanced lithography process, and 160% lower power consumption.
The UHD Graphics 605 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9300M GS in performance tests.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
