Quadro T2000 Max-Q vs GeForce 9300M G

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
9100M G 9100M G mGPU AMD 9100M G mGPU Intel 9200M 9200M GS 9200M GS GDDR3 9300M G 9300M GS 9300M GS DDR2 9300M GS GDDR3 9400M 9400M (G) / ION (LE) 9400M G 9400M GeForceBoost 9500M G 9500M GE 9500M GS 9600M GS 9600M GT 9600M GT Mac Edition 9650M GS 9650M GT 9700M GT 9700M GTS 9800M GS 9800M GT 9800M GTS 9800M GT SLI 9800M GTS SLI 9800M GTX 9800M GTX SLI 9800S
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
T400 Mobile T500 Mobile T600 Mobile T1000 Mobile T1000 Max-Q T1200 Max-Q T1200 Mobile T2000 Mobile T2000 Max-Q T500 Max-Q T550 Mobile T600 Max-Q

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 9300M G with Quadro T2000 Max-Q, including specs and performance data.

9300M G
2008
256 MB GDDR3, 13 Watt
0.20

T2000 Max-Q outperforms 9300M G by a whopping 8170% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
9300M G 9300M G
T2000 Max-Q T2000 Max-Q

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1446358
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.1931.89
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameG86TU117
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date1 February 2008 (17 years ago)27 May 2019 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores161024
Core clock speed400 MHz1200 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1620 MHz
Number of transistors210 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)13 Watt40 Watt
Texture fill rate3.200103.7
Floating-point processing power0.0256 TFLOPS3.318 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs864
L1 Cacheno data1 MB
L2 Cache16 KB1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount256 MB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed600 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth9.6 GB/s128.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.06.5
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA1.17.5

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

9300M G 0.20
T2000 Max-Q 16.54
+8170%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

9300M G 84
Samples: 50
T2000 Max-Q 6950
+8174%
Samples: 529

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD0−157
1440p-0−126
4K-0−138

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−3500%
35−40
+3500%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−3500%
35−40
+3500%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−2200%
65−70
+2200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−800%
60−65
+800%
Valorant 24−27
−432%
130−140
+432%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 12−14
−1692%
210−220
+1692%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−3500%
35−40
+3500%
Dota 2 9−10
−1278%
124
+1278%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−2200%
65−70
+2200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−800%
60−65
+800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−1160%
63
+1160%
Valorant 24−27
−432%
130−140
+432%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−3500%
35−40
+3500%
Dota 2 9−10
−1156%
113
+1156%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−2200%
65−70
+2200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−800%
60−65
+800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−560%
33
+560%
Valorant 24−27
−432%
130−140
+432%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
−1600%
30−35
+1600%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−7950%
160−170
+7950%

1440p
Ultra

Escape from Tarkov 2−3
−1700%
35−40
+1700%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−4100%
40−45
+4100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−2400%
24−27
+2400%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−121%
30−35
+121%
Valorant 1−2
−9400%
95−100
+9400%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−1600%
16−18
+1600%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−750%
16−18
+750%

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Fortnite 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Fortnite 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Metro Exodus 33
+0%
33
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Valorant 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Dota 2 46
+0%
46
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Valorant, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the T2000 Max-Q is 9400% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • T2000 Max-Q performs better in 27 tests (42%)
  • there's a draw in 37 tests (58%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 0.20 16.54
Recency 1 February 2008 27 May 2019
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 80 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 13 Watt 40 Watt

9300M G has 207.7% lower power consumption.

T2000 Max-Q, on the other hand, has a 8170% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 566.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro T2000 Max-Q is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9300M G in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 9300M G is a notebook graphics card while Quadro T2000 Max-Q is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce 9300M G
GeForce 9300M G
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
Quadro T2000 Max-Q
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

9300M G GeForce 9300M G
vs
8600M GS GeForce 8600M GS
T2000 Max-Q Quadro T2000 Max-Q
vs
T600 Mobile Quadro T600 Mobile
9300M G GeForce 9300M G
vs
ATI Mobility HD 3470 Mobility Radeon HD 3470
ATI Mobility HD 3470 ATI Radeon HD 3470
vs
HD 8670 OEM 8670 OEM
ATI Mobility HD 3470 ATI Radeon HD 3470
vs
FX 5100 5100
ATI Mobility HD 3470 ATI Radeon HD 3470
vs
Radeon 625 625
9300M G GeForce 9300M G
vs
ATI Mobility HD 3470 Hybrid X2 3470 Hybrid X2
9300M G GeForce 9300M G
vs
ATI HD 4100 4100
9300M G GeForce 9300M G
vs
T1000 Max-Q T1000 Max-Q
9300M G GeForce 9300M G
vs
RTX 4050 Mobile 4050 Mobile
9300M G GeForce 9300M G
vs
T1200 Max-Q T1200 Max-Q
9300M G GeForce 9300M G
vs
T500 Max-Q Max-Q
9300M G GeForce 9300M G
vs
T600 Max-Q Max-Q

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.3 22 votes

Rate GeForce 9300M G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 106 votes

Rate Quadro T2000 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9300M G or Quadro T2000 Max-Q, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.