Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q vs GeForce 9300M G

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
8400M G 8400M GS 8400M GT 8600M GS 9300M G
VS
Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q Quadro RTX 5000 X2 Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 9300M G with Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, including specs and performance data.

9300M G
2008
256 MB GDDR3, 13 Watt
0.21

RTX 4000 Max-Q outperforms 9300M G by a whopping 15119% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

9300M G 9300M G
RTX 4000 Max-Q RTX 4000 Max-Q

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1386171
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.1528.20
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameG86TU104
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date1 February 2008 (17 years ago)27 May 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores162560
Core clock speed400 MHz780 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1380 MHz
Number of transistors210 million13,600 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)13 Watt80 Watt
Texture fill rate3.200220.8
Floating-point processing power0.0256 TFLOPS7.066 TFLOPS
ROPs464
TMUs8160
Tensor Coresno data320
Ray Tracing Coresno data40

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount256 MB8 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed600 MHz1625 MHz
Memory bandwidth9.6 GB/s416.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model4.06.5
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA1.17.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

9300M G 0.21
RTX 4000 Max-Q 31.96
+15119%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

9300M G 84
RTX 4000 Max-Q 12569
+14863%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD0−188
1440p-0−146
4K-0−156

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−12
−482%
60−65
+482%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−3300%
65−70
+3300%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−12
−482%
60−65
+482%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−3300%
65−70
+3300%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−2940%
150−160
+2940%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−1575%
65−70
+1575%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−12
−482%
60−65
+482%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−3300%
65−70
+3300%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−843%
66
+843%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−2940%
150−160
+2940%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−2967%
180−190
+2967%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−1575%
65−70
+1575%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−2700%
110−120
+2700%
World of Tanks 10−12
−2418%
270−280
+2418%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−12
−482%
60−65
+482%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−3300%
65−70
+3300%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−1171%
85−90
+1171%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−2940%
150−160
+2940%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−2967%
180−190
+2967%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−833%
27−30
+833%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−17400%
170−180
+17400%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−933%
30−35
+933%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−2475%
100−110
+2475%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−1225%
50−55
+1225%
Valorant 4−5
−2300%
95−100
+2300%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2 14−16
−307%
60−65
+307%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−307%
60−65
+307%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 0−1 100−110
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−307%
60−65
+307%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 0−1 35−40
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−550%
12−14
+550%
Dota 2 14−16
−333%
65
+333%
Valorant 0−1 45−50

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Metro Exodus 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Valorant 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Dota 2 36
+0%
36
+0%
Fortnite 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Metro Exodus 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Valorant 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Dota 2 101
+0%
101
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Valorant 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
World of Tanks 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Metro Exodus 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Fortnite 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 4000 Max-Q is 17400% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 4000 Max-Q is ahead in 30 tests (49%)
  • there's a draw in 31 test (51%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 0.21 31.96
Recency 1 February 2008 27 May 2019
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 80 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 13 Watt 80 Watt

9300M G has 515.4% lower power consumption.

RTX 4000 Max-Q, on the other hand, has a 15119% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 566.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9300M G in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 9300M G is a notebook graphics card while Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce 9300M G
GeForce 9300M G
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

9300M G GeForce 9300M G
vs
ATI Mobility HD 3470 Mobility Radeon HD 3470
RTX 4000 Max-Q Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
vs
P5200 Max-Q Quadro P5200 Max-Q
9300M G GeForce 9300M G
vs
9300M GS GeForce 9300M GS
ATI HD 4350 Radeon HD 4350
vs
ATI X1650 PRO Radeon X1650 PRO
GeForce 305M GeForce 305M
vs
SIS Mirage 3+ 672MX Mirage 3+ 672MX
NVS 140M Quadro NVS 140M
vs
ATI Mobility FireGL T2 Mobility FireGL T2
G 105M GeForce G 105M
vs
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD
9400M (G) / ION (LE) GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE)
vs
Quadro P620 Quadro P620
ATI HD 4200 Radeon HD 4200
vs
ATI X300 SE Radeon X300 SE
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics
vs
FX 5200 Rev. 2 GeForce FX 5200 Rev. 2
ATI HD 3200 Radeon HD 3200
vs
NVS 135M Quadro NVS 135M
ATI HD 3200 Radeon HD 3200
vs
GMA X3100 GMA X3100
ATI HD 3100 Radeon HD 3100
vs
ATI X1900 GT Radeon X1900 GT

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.4 21 vote

Rate GeForce 9300M G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 24 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.