Radeon 620 vs GeForce 920M

Place in performance ranking	871	812
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.04	0.34
Architecture	Kepler (2012−2018)	GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code name	N16V-GM-S	Polaris 24
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	27 January 2015 (9 years ago)	12 August 2019 (4 years ago)
Current price	$895	$67

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Radeon 620 has 750% better value for money than GeForce 920M.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	384	384
Core clock speed	954 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	no data	1024 MHz
Number of transistors	915 million	1,550 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	33 Watt	50 Watt
Texture fill rate	30.53	24.58
Floating-point performance	297.6 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce 920M and Radeon 620 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Bus support	PCI Express 3.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3	DDR3, GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	1800 MHz	2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth	14.4 GB/s	14.4 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GPU Boost	2.0	no data
Optimus	+	no data
GameWorks	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (12_0)
Shader Model	5.1	6.3
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.2.131
CUDA	+	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GeForce 920M 1.87

Radeon 620 2.32
+24.1%

Radeon 620 outperforms GeForce 920M by 24% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GeForce 920M 723

Radeon 620 897
+24.1%

Radeon 620 outperforms GeForce 920M by 24% in Passmark.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GeForce 920M 1162

Radeon 620 1730
+48.9%

Radeon 620 outperforms GeForce 920M by 49% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	16 −12.5%	18−20 +12.5%
4K	9 −11.1%	10−12 +11.1%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

4−5

−25%

5−6
+25%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −200%	3−4 +200%
Battlefield 5	2−3 −100%	4−5 +100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−11 −10%	10−12 +10%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −25%	5−6 +25%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Far Cry New Dawn	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Forza Horizon 4	16 +220%	5−6 −220%
Hitman 3	3−4 −33.3%	4−5 +33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	2−3 −50%	3−4 +50%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 −25%	5−6 +25%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −200%	3−4 +200%
Battlefield 5	2−3 −100%	4−5 +100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−11 −10%	10−12 +10%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −25%	5−6 +25%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Far Cry New Dawn	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Forza Horizon 4	15 +200%	5−6 −200%
Hitman 3	3−4 −33.3%	4−5 +33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	2−3 −50%	3−4 +50%
Metro Exodus	2 −50%	3−4 +50%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 −25%	5−6 +25%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	7 +16.7%	6−7 −16.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −200%	3−4 +200%
Battlefield 5	2−3 −100%	4−5 +100%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −25%	5−6 +25%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Far Cry New Dawn	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 −66.7%	5−6 +66.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4 −50%	6−7 +50%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Hitman 3	4−5 −25%	5−6 +25%
Horizon Zero Dawn	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%
Metro Exodus	0−1	1−2
Red Dead Redemption 2	0−1	1−2
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	5−6 −20%	6−7 +20%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Far Cry 5	3−4 −33.3%	4−5 +33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Hitman 3	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	1−2
Far Cry 5	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	5−6 −20%	6−7 +20%

This is how GeForce 920M and Radeon 620 compete in popular games:

Radeon 620 is 12.5% faster than GeForce 920M in 1080p
Radeon 620 is 11.1% faster than GeForce 920M in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GeForce 920M is 220% faster than the Radeon 620.
in Assassin's Creed Odyssey, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Radeon 620 is 200% faster than the GeForce 920M.

All in all, in popular games: