Radeon Instinct Vega vs GeForce G 103M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1484not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureG9x (2007−2010)GCN 5.1 (2018−2022)
GPU code nameG98Vega 20
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 September 2009 (16 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8no data
Core clock speed640 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1500 MHz
Manufacturing process technology65 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data225 Watt

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2no data
Maximum RAM amount512 MBno data
Memory bus width64 Bitno data
Memory clock speed500 MHz2400 MHz
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.012.0 (12_1)
OpenGLno data4.6

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 65 nm 7 nm

Instinct Vega has a 828.6% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce G 103M and Radeon Instinct Vega. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce G 103M is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Instinct Vega is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce G 103M
GeForce G 103M
AMD Radeon Instinct Vega
Radeon Instinct Vega

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 36 votes

Rate GeForce G 103M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 42 votes

Rate Radeon Instinct Vega on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce G 103M or Radeon Instinct Vega, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.