Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile vs GeForce 910M

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking965not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.27no data
ArchitectureKepler 2.0 (2013−2015)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameGK208BVega 10
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date13 March 2015 (9 years ago)1 June 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3843584
Core clock speed641 MHz1138 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1301 MHz
Number of transistors915 million12,500 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)33 Watt120 Watt
Texture fill rate20.51291.4
Floating-point processing power0.4923 TFLOPS9.326 TFLOPS
ROPs864
TMUs32224

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3HBM2
Maximum RAM amountDDR3 MB8 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit2048 Bit
Memory clock speed1001 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth16.02 GB/s409.6 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GPU Boost2.0no data
Optimus+-
GameWorks+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.1.125
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 March 2015 1 June 2018
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 33 Watt 120 Watt

GeForce 910M has 263.6% lower power consumption.

RX Vega 56 Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 910M and Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 910M
GeForce 910M
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile
Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 60 votes

Rate GeForce 910M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 5 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.