Radeon RX 6400 vs GeForce 910M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 910M with Radeon RX 6400, including specs and performance data.

GeForce 910M
2015
DDR3 MB DDR3, 33 Watt
1.56

RX 6400 outperforms 910M by a whopping 1169% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking969279
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data53.99
Power efficiency3.2425.59
ArchitectureKepler 2.0 (2013−2015)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGK208BNavi 24
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date13 March 2015 (9 years ago)19 January 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$159

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384768
Core clock speed641 MHz1923 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2321 MHz
Number of transistors915 million5,400 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)33 Watt53 Watt
Texture fill rate20.51111.4
Floating-point processing power0.4923 TFLOPS3.565 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs3248
Ray Tracing Coresno data12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x4
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amountDDR3 MB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1001 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth16.02 GB/s128.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GPU Boost2.0no data
Optimus+-
GameWorks+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.22.2
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GeForce 910M 1.56
RX 6400 19.79
+1169%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce 910M 601
RX 6400 7625
+1169%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD8
−1150%
100−110
+1150%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data1.59

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−1150%
50−55
+1150%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−1150%
75−80
+1150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−1100%
60−65
+1100%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−1150%
50−55
+1150%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−1100%
24−27
+1100%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
−1150%
50−55
+1150%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−1150%
50−55
+1150%
Hitman 3 6−7
−1150%
75−80
+1150%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
−1150%
200−210
+1150%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−1067%
35−40
+1067%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10
−1122%
110−120
+1122%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−1076%
400−450
+1076%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−1150%
75−80
+1150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−1100%
60−65
+1100%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−1150%
50−55
+1150%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−1100%
24−27
+1100%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
−1150%
50−55
+1150%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−1150%
50−55
+1150%
Hitman 3 6−7
−1150%
75−80
+1150%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
−1150%
200−210
+1150%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−1067%
35−40
+1067%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10
−1122%
110−120
+1122%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 17
−1135%
210−220
+1135%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−1076%
400−450
+1076%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−1150%
75−80
+1150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−1100%
60−65
+1100%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−1150%
50−55
+1150%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−1100%
24−27
+1100%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−1150%
50−55
+1150%
Hitman 3 6−7
−1150%
75−80
+1150%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
−1150%
200−210
+1150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10
−1122%
110−120
+1122%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−1150%
150−160
+1150%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−1076%
400−450
+1076%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−1067%
35−40
+1067%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
−1100%
24−27
+1100%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−1100%
24−27
+1100%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−1100%
24−27
+1100%
Hitman 3 7−8
−1114%
85−90
+1114%
Horizon Zero Dawn 5−6
−1100%
60−65
+1100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 8−9
−1150%
100−105
+1150%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−1150%
50−55
+1150%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−1100%
24−27
+1100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−1067%
35−40
+1067%

This is how GeForce 910M and RX 6400 compete in popular games:

  • RX 6400 is 1150% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.56 19.79
Recency 13 March 2015 19 January 2022
Chip lithography 28 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 33 Watt 53 Watt

GeForce 910M has 60.6% lower power consumption.

RX 6400, on the other hand, has a 1168.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, and a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6400 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 910M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 910M is a notebook card while Radeon RX 6400 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 910M
GeForce 910M
AMD Radeon RX 6400
Radeon RX 6400

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 60 votes

Rate GeForce 910M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1971 vote

Rate Radeon RX 6400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.