UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) vs GeForce 9100M G

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
9100M G 9100M G mGPU AMD 9100M G mGPU Intel 9200M 9200M GS 9200M GS GDDR3 9300M G 9300M GS 9300M GS DDR2 9300M GS GDDR3 9400M 9400M (G) / ION (LE) 9400M G 9400M GeForceBoost 9500M G 9500M GE 9500M GS 9600M GS 9600M GT 9600M GT Mac Edition 9650M GS 9650M GT 9700M GT 9700M GTS 9800M GS 9800M GT 9800M GTS 9800M GT SLI 9800M GTS SLI 9800M GTX 9800M GTX SLI 9800S
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
(Jasper Lake 16 EU) (Jasper Lake 24 EU) (Jasper Lake 32 EU) G1 G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) G4 G7 P630 Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) Xe 750 32EUs Xe G4 48EUs

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 9100M G and UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU), covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

9100M G
2008
0.20

Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) outperforms 9100M G by a whopping 950% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
9100M G 9100M G
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU)

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1452919
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data16.13
Architectureno dataGen. 11 (2021)
GPU code nameMCP77MH MCP79MHGen. 11
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date3 June 2008 (17 years ago)11 January 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores824
Core clock speed450 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speedno data800 MHz
Manufacturing process technology65 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data4.8 - 10 Watt

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Shared memory++

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1012_1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD1−2
−1200%
13
+1200%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−40%
7−8
+40%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−267%
10−12
+267%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−40%
7−8
+40%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−57.1%
10−12
+57.1%
Valorant 24−27
−60%
40−45
+60%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 12−14
−258%
40−45
+258%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Dota 2 9−10
−88.9%
17
+88.9%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−267%
10−12
+267%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−40%
7−8
+40%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−57.1%
10−12
+57.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−60%
8
+60%
Valorant 24−27
−60%
40−45
+60%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Dota 2 9−10
−77.8%
16
+77.8%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−267%
10−12
+267%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−40%
7−8
+40%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−57.1%
10−12
+57.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+25%
4
−25%
Valorant 24−27
−60%
40−45
+60%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−950%
21−24
+950%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−7.1%
14−16
+7.1%
Valorant 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Fortnite 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Fortnite 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Metro Exodus 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

4K
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

This is how 9100M G and UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) compete in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) is 1200% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the 9100M G is 25% faster.
  • in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) is 950% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • 9100M G performs better in 1 test (2%)
  • UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) performs better in 29 tests (53%)
  • there's a draw in 25 tests (45%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 0.20 2.10
Recency 3 June 2008 11 January 2021
Chip lithography 65 nm 10 nm

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) has a 950% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, and a 550% more advanced lithography process.

The UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9100M G in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce 9100M G
GeForce 9100M G
Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU)
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU)
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

9100M G GeForce 9100M G
vs
ATI Mobility HD 3470 Mobility Radeon HD 3470
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU)
vs
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
9100M G GeForce 9100M G
vs
8400M GT GeForce 8400M GT
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics
vs
8600M GT SLI GeForce 8600M GT SLI
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics
vs
GeForce G110M GeForce G110M
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics
vs
RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation
ATI Mobility X1400 ATI Mobility Radeon X1400
vs
FX 5950 Ultra FX 5950 Ultra
9100M G NVIDIA GeForce 9100M G
vs
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
9100M G NVIDIA GeForce 9100M G
vs
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
9100M G NVIDIA GeForce 9100M G
vs
UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen)
8400M GS NVIDIA GeForce 8400M GS
vs
GRID M6-8Q GRID M6-8Q
8400M GS NVIDIA GeForce 8400M GS
vs
GRID M60-1Q GRID M60-1Q
8400M GS NVIDIA GeForce 8400M GS
vs
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G4 Lake-U Xe Graphics G4

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.5 22 votes

Rate GeForce 9100M G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 60 votes

Rate UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9100M G or UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU), agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.