ATI Radeon X800 SE vs GeForce 9100M G

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 9100M G with Radeon X800 SE, including specs and performance data.

9100M G
2008
0.20

X800 SE outperforms 9100M G by an impressive 55% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking14561384
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Architectureno dataR400 (2004−2008)
GPU code nameMCP77MH MCP79MHR423
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date3 June 2008 (17 years ago)4 October 2004 (21 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8no data
Core clock speed450 MHz425 MHz
Number of transistorsno data160 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm130 nm
Texture fill rateno data3.400
ROPsno data8
TMUsno data8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 1.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataDDR
Maximum RAM amountno data128 MB
Memory bus widthno data256 Bit
Memory clock speedno data350 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data22.4 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX109.0b (9_2)
OpenGLno data2.1
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

9100M G 0.20
ATI X800 SE 0.31
+55%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

9100M G 83
Samples: 83
ATI X800 SE 129
+55.4%
Samples: 1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−40%
7−8
+40%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−40%
7−8
+40%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
Valorant 24−27
−40%
35−40
+40%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 12−14
−50%
18−20
+50%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 9−10
−33.3%
12−14
+33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−40%
7−8
+40%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−40%
7−8
+40%
Valorant 24−27
−40%
35−40
+40%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 9−10
−33.3%
12−14
+33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−40%
7−8
+40%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−40%
7−8
+40%
Valorant 24−27
−40%
35−40
+40%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−50%
21−24
+50%
Valorant 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.20 0.31
Recency 3 June 2008 4 October 2004
Chip lithography 65 nm 130 nm

9100M G has an age advantage of 3 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

ATI X800 SE, on the other hand, has a 55% higher aggregate performance score.

The Radeon X800 SE is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9100M G in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 9100M G is a notebook graphics card while Radeon X800 SE is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9100M G
GeForce 9100M G
ATI Radeon X800 SE
Radeon X800 SE

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 22 votes

Rate GeForce 9100M G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 3 votes

Rate Radeon X800 SE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9100M G or Radeon X800 SE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.