Radeon X800 SE: specs and benchmarks
Aggregate performance score
Radeon X800 SE provides poor gaming and benchmark performance at 0.31% of a leader's which is GeForce RTX 5090 D.
Contents
Summary
ATI started Radeon X800 SE sales 4 October 2004. This is a R400 architecture desktop card based on 130 nm manufacturing process and primarily aimed at office use. 128 MB of DDR memory clocked at 0.35 GHz are supplied, and together with 256 Bit memory interface this creates a bandwidth of 22.4 GB/s.
Compatibility-wise, this is a single-slot graphics card attached via PCIe 1.0 x16 interface.
Primary details
Some basic facts about Radeon X800 SE: architecture, market segment, release date etc.
| Place in the ranking | 1362 | |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | |
| Architecture | R400 (2004−2008) | |
| GPU code name | R423 | |
| Market segment | Desktop | |
| Release date | 4 October 2004 (20 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Radeon X800 SE's specs such as number of shaders, GPU base clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of Radeon X800 SE's performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.
| Core clock speed | 425 MHz | of 2670 MHz (Arc B580) |
| Number of transistors | 160 million | of 185,000 million (Radeon Instinct MI350X) |
| Manufacturing process technology | 130 nm | of 3 nm (Arc Graphics 140V) |
| Texture fill rate | 3.400 | of 2,554 (Radeon Instinct MI300X) |
| ROPs | 8 | of 512 (Moore Threads MTT S4000) |
| TMUs | 8 | of 1280 (Data Center GPU Max NEXT) |
Form factor & compatibility
This section provides details about the physical dimensions of Radeon X800 SE and its compatibility with other computer components. This information is useful when selecting a computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards, it includes details about the interface and bus (for motherboard compatibility) and additional power connectors (for power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | |
| Width | 1-slot | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of memory installed on Radeon X800 SE: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM instead.
| Memory type | DDR | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 128 MB | of 288 GB (Radeon Instinct MI325X) |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | of 8192 Bit (Radeon Instinct MI250X) |
| Memory clock speed | 350 MHz | of 16000 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile) |
| Memory bandwidth | 22.4 GB/s | of 5,171 GB/s (Radeon Instinct MI300X) |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on Radeon X800 SE. As a rule, this section is relevant only for desktop reference graphics cards, since for notebook ones the availability of certain video outputs depends on the laptop model, while non-reference desktop models can (though not necessarily will) bear a different set of video ports.
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
API and SDK compatibility
APIs supported by Radeon X800 SE, sometimes including their particular versions.
| DirectX | 9.0b (9_2) | |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | of 4.6 (GeForce RTX 5090 D) |
| OpenCL | N/A | |
| Vulkan | N/A |
Benchmark performance
Synthetic benchmark performance of Radeon X800 SE. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Send your test results of Radeon X800 SE.
NVIDIA equivalent
According to our data, the closest NVIDIA alternative to Radeon X800 SE is GeForce 210, which is faster by 3% and higher by 9 positions in our ranking.
Here are some closest NVIDIA rivals to Radeon X800 SE:
Similar GPUs
Here is our recommendation of several graphics cards that are more or less close in performance to the one reviewed.
