Radeon 660M vs GeForce 9100M G

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 9100M G and Radeon 660M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

9100M G
2008
0.15

660M outperforms 9100M G by a whopping 4620% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1419522
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data13.98
Architectureno dataRDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameMCP77MH MCP79MHRembrandt+
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date3 June 2008 (16 years ago)3 January 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8384
Core clock speed450 MHz1500 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1900 MHz
Number of transistorsno data13,100 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data40 Watt
Texture fill rateno data45.60
Floating-point processing powerno data1.459 TFLOPS
ROPsno data16
TMUsno data24
Ray Tracing Coresno data6

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountno dataSystem Shared
Memory bus widthno dataSystem Shared
Memory clock speedno dataSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.0
Vulkan-1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

9100M G 0.15
Radeon 660M 7.08
+4620%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

9100M G 68
Radeon 660M 3163
+4551%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD0−125

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 1−2
−2800%
29
+2800%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2300%
24
+2300%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 1−2
−2200%
23
+2200%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1900%
20
+1900%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−1600%
30−35
+1600%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−300%
27−30
+300%
Valorant 24−27
−220%
80−85
+220%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 1−2
−1200%
13
+1200%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 10−12
−1009%
120−130
+1009%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1300%
14
+1300%
Dota 2 9−10
−522%
56
+522%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−1600%
30−35
+1600%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−300%
27−30
+300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−767%
26
+767%
Valorant 24−27
−220%
80−85
+220%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1500%
16−18
+1500%
Dota 2 9−10
−433%
48
+433%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−1600%
30−35
+1600%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−300%
27−30
+300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−400%
15
+400%
Valorant 24−27
−220%
80−85
+220%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−1900%
40−45
+1900%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Forza Horizon 4 0−1 18−20

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−26.7%
18−20
+26.7%
Valorant 1−2
−3900%
40−45
+3900%

4K
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5 1−2
−700%
8−9
+700%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry 5 30
+0%
30
+0%
Fortnite 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 39
+0%
39
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry 5 26
+0%
26
+0%
Fortnite 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 32
+0%
32
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 25
+0%
25
+0%
Metro Exodus 15
+0%
15
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Far Cry 5 25
+0%
25
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Metro Exodus 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Valorant 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 0−1 0−1
Metro Exodus 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Dota 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Valorant, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the Radeon 660M is 3900% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Radeon 660M is ahead in 27 tests (45%)
  • there's a draw in 33 tests (55%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.15 7.08
Recency 3 June 2008 3 January 2023
Chip lithography 65 nm 6 nm

Radeon 660M has a 4620% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, and a 983.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon 660M is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9100M G in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9100M G
GeForce 9100M G
AMD Radeon 660M
Radeon 660M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 22 votes

Rate GeForce 9100M G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 360 votes

Rate Radeon 660M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9100M G or Radeon 660M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.