Radeon 660M vs GeForce 9600M GT Mac Edition

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated565
Place by popularitynot in top-10099
Power efficiencyno data14.78
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameG96CRembrandt+
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date25 October 2008 (17 years ago)3 January 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores32384
Core clock speed500 MHz1500 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1900 MHz
Number of transistors314 million13,100 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)23 Watt40 Watt
Texture fill rate8.00045.60
Floating-point processing power0.08 TFLOPS1.459 TFLOPS
ROPs816
TMUs1624
Ray Tracing Coresno data6
L0 Cacheno data96 KB
L1 Cacheno data128 KB
L2 Cache32 KB2 MB
L3 Cacheno data8 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-IIPCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount512 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed792 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth25.34 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.7
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.12.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA1.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 25 October 2008 3 January 2023
Chip lithography 55 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 23 Watt 40 Watt

9600M GT Mac Edition has 73.9% lower power consumption.

Radeon 660M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 14 years, and a 816.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9600M GT Mac Edition and Radeon 660M. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GT Mac Edition
GeForce 9600M GT Mac Edition
AMD Radeon 660M
Radeon 660M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 4 votes

Rate GeForce 9600M GT Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 442 votes

Rate Radeon 660M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9600M GT Mac Edition or Radeon 660M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.