GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile vs 9100M G

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
9100M G 9100M G mGPU AMD 9100M G mGPU Intel 9200M 9200M GS 9200M GS GDDR3 9300M G 9300M GS 9300M GS DDR2 9300M GS GDDR3 9400M 9400M (G) / ION (LE) 9400M G 9400M GeForceBoost 9500M G 9500M GE 9500M GS 9600M GS 9600M GT 9600M GT Mac Edition 9650M GS 9650M GT 9700M GT 9700M GTS 9800M GS 9800M GT 9800M GTS 9800M GT SLI 9800M GTS SLI 9800M GTX 9800M GTX SLI 9800S
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
3050 4GB Mobile 3050 6GB Mobile 3050 A Mobile 3050 Max-Q 3050 Max-Q Refresh 3050 Max-Q Refresh 4 GB 3050 Max-Q Refresh 6 GB 3050 Mobile 3050 Mobile Refresh 3050 Mobile Refresh 4 GB 3050 Mobile Refresh 6 GB 3050 Ti Max-Q 3050 Ti Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 9100M G and GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

9100M G
2008
0.20

RTX 3050 6GB Mobile outperforms 9100M G by a whopping 11365% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
9100M G 9100M G
RTX 3050 6GB Mobile RTX 3050 6GB Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1449270
Place by popularitynot in top-10066
Power efficiencyno data29.35
Architectureno dataAmpere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameMCP77MH MCP79MHGN20-P0-R 6 GB
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date3 June 2008 (17 years ago)6 January 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores82560
Core clock speed450 MHz1237 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1492 MHz
Manufacturing process technology65 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data60 Watt (35 - 80 Watt TGP)

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data6 GB
Memory bus widthno data96 Bit
Memory clock speedno data12000 MHz
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1012_2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD0−170
1440p-0−134

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−8000%
81
+8000%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−6300%
64
+6300%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−3000%
90−95
+3000%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−1200%
90−95
+1200%
Valorant 24−27
−552%
160−170
+552%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 12−14
−2017%
250−260
+2017%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−4500%
46
+4500%
Dota 2 9−10
−1244%
120−130
+1244%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−3000%
90−95
+3000%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−1200%
90−95
+1200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−1720%
91
+1720%
Valorant 24−27
−552%
160−170
+552%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−3800%
39
+3800%
Dota 2 9−10
−1244%
120−130
+1244%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−3000%
90−95
+3000%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−1200%
90−95
+1200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−900%
50
+900%
Valorant 24−27
−552%
160−170
+552%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
−2400%
50−55
+2400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−8650%
170−180
+8650%

1440p
Ultra

Escape from Tarkov 2−3
−2500%
50−55
+2500%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−5900%
60−65
+5900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−3600%
37
+3600%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−214%
40−45
+214%
Valorant 1−2
−13600%
130−140
+13600%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−2400%
24−27
+2400%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−1150%
24−27
+1150%

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Far Cry 5 85
+0%
85
+0%
Fortnite 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Far Cry 5 78
+0%
78
+0%
Fortnite 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 92
+0%
92
+0%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Far Cry 5 74
+0%
74
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 40
+0%
40
+0%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Valorant 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Far Cry 5 52
+0%
52
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Metro Exodus 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Dota 2 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Valorant, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 3050 6GB Mobile is 13600% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 3050 6GB Mobile performs better in 27 tests (42%)
  • there's a draw in 37 tests (58%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 0.20 22.93
Recency 3 June 2008 6 January 2023
Chip lithography 65 nm 8 nm

RTX 3050 6GB Mobile has a 11365% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, and a 712.5% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9100M G in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce 9100M G
GeForce 9100M G
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

9100M G GeForce 9100M G
vs
9300M GS GeForce 9300M GS
RTX 3050 6GB Mobile GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile
vs
RTX 2060 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q
9100M G GeForce 9100M G
vs
ATI E2400 Radeon E2400
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics
vs
GMA 500 GMA 500
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics
vs
RTX 4090 RTX 4090
NVS 150M NVS 150M
vs
RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6X RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6X
FX 360M FX 360M
vs
7050 + nForce 620i 7050 + nForce 620i
FX 360M FX 360M
vs
GTX 460 v2 ES GTX 460 v2 ES
8400M GS 8400M GS
vs
Go 7900 GTX Go 7900 GTX
8400M GS 8400M GS
vs
9400M GeForceBoost 9400M GeForceBoost
8400M GS 8400M GS
vs
S3G UniChrome Pro
8400M GS 8400M GS
vs
RX 6800M RX 6800M
ATI HD 3200 HD 3200
vs
Pro WX 3200 Pro WX 3200

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.5 22 votes

Rate GeForce 9100M G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1018 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9100M G or GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.