GeForce GT 240M LE vs 9100M G

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1465not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Architectureno dataTesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameMCP77MH MCP79MHG96C
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date3 June 2008 (17 years ago)15 January 2010 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores832
Core clock speed450 MHz600 MHz
Number of transistorsno data314 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data23 Watt
Texture fill rateno data9.600
Floating-point processing powerno data0.096 TFLOPS
ROPsno data8
TMUsno data16
L2 Cacheno data32 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 2.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataDDR2
Maximum RAM amountno data512 MB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data400 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data12.8 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1011.1 (10_0)
Shader Modelno data4.0
OpenGLno data3.3
OpenCLno data1.1
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA-1.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 June 2008 15 January 2010
Chip lithography 65 nm 55 nm

GT 240M LE has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 18.2% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9100M G and GeForce GT 240M LE. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9100M G
GeForce 9100M G
NVIDIA GeForce GT 240M LE
GeForce GT 240M LE

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 22 votes

Rate GeForce 9100M G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate GeForce GT 240M LE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9100M G or GeForce GT 240M LE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.