GeForce GT 240M LE vs 9300M GS

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1394not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.68no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameG98G96C
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date4 June 2008 (17 years ago)15 January 2010 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores832
Core clock speed550 MHz600 MHz
Number of transistors210 million314 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)13 Watt23 Watt
Texture fill rate4.4009.600
Floating-point processing power0.0224 TFLOPS0.096 TFLOPS
Gigaflops34no data
ROPs48
TMUs816
L2 Cache16 KB32 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-IPCIe 2.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR2
Maximum RAM amount256 MB512 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz400 MHz
Memory bandwidth11.2 GB/s12.8 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model4.04.0
OpenGL3.33.3
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+1.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 June 2008 15 January 2010
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 512 MB
Chip lithography 65 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 13 Watt 23 Watt

9300M GS has 76.9% lower power consumption.

GT 240M LE, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 18.2% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9300M GS and GeForce GT 240M LE. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9300M GS
GeForce 9300M GS
NVIDIA GeForce GT 240M LE
GeForce GT 240M LE

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 165 votes

Rate GeForce 9300M GS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate GeForce GT 240M LE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9300M GS or GeForce GT 240M LE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.