RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile vs Quadro FX 370M
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Quadro FX 370M and RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
2000 Ada Generation Mobile outperforms 370M by a whopping 16062% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1425 | 156 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 0.85 | 54.65 |
| Architecture | Tesla (2006−2010) | Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) |
| GPU code name | G98 | AD107 |
| Market segment | Mobile workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 15 August 2008 (17 years ago) | 21 March 2023 (2 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 8 | 3072 |
| Core clock speed | 550 MHz | 1635 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 2115 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 210 million | 18,900 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 20 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 2.200 | 203.0 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.0224 TFLOPS | 12.99 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 4 | 48 |
| TMUs | 4 | 96 |
| Tensor Cores | no data | 96 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 24 |
| L1 Cache | no data | 3 MB |
| L2 Cache | 16 KB | 12 MB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | no data | large |
| Interface | MXM-II | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | 8 GB |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 600 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 9.6 GB/s | 256.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
| Resizable BAR | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | Portable Device Dependent |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 6.8 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.3 |
| CUDA | 1.1 | 8.9 |
| DLSS | - | + |
Synthetic benchmarks
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−15900%
|
160−170
+15900%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 5−6
−15900%
|
800−850
+15900%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−15900%
|
160−170
+15900%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 3−4
−14900%
|
450−500
+14900%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 5−6
−15900%
|
800−850
+15900%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 7−8
−15614%
|
1100−1150
+15614%
|
| Valorant | 24−27
−15900%
|
4000−4050
+15900%
|
Full HD
High
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 12−14
−15733%
|
1900−1950
+15733%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−15900%
|
160−170
+15900%
|
| Dota 2 | 9−10
−16011%
|
1450−1500
+16011%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 3−4
−14900%
|
450−500
+14900%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 5−6
−15900%
|
800−850
+15900%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 7−8
−15614%
|
1100−1150
+15614%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5−6
−15900%
|
800−850
+15900%
|
| Valorant | 24−27
−15900%
|
4000−4050
+15900%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−15900%
|
160−170
+15900%
|
| Dota 2 | 9−10
−16011%
|
1450−1500
+16011%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 3−4
−14900%
|
450−500
+14900%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 5−6
−15900%
|
800−850
+15900%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 7−8
−15614%
|
1100−1150
+15614%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5−6
−15900%
|
800−850
+15900%
|
| Valorant | 24−27
−15900%
|
4000−4050
+15900%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 2−3
−14900%
|
300−310
+14900%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 2−3
−14900%
|
300−310
+14900%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Forza Horizon 4 | 1−2
−15900%
|
160−170
+15900%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 0−1 | 0−1 |
4K
High
| Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
−15900%
|
2400−2450
+15900%
|
| Valorant | 1−2
−15900%
|
160−170
+15900%
|
4K
Ultra
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 1−2
−15900%
|
160−170
+15900%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 2−3
−14900%
|
300−310
+14900%
|
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.21 | 33.94 |
| Recency | 15 August 2008 | 21 March 2023 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | 8 GB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 20 Watt | 50 Watt |
FX 370M has 150% lower power consumption.
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile, on the other hand, has a 16061.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1200% more advanced lithography process.
The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro FX 370M in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
