GeForce RTX 4070 Ti vs 8800M GTX

Place in the ranking	1048	6
Place by popularity	not in top-100	78
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	48.77
Power efficiency	1.28	20.04
Architecture	Tesla (2006−2010)	Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code name	G92	AD104
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	1 November 2007 (17 years ago)	3 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$799

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	96	7680
Core clock speed	500 MHz	2310 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	2610 MHz
Number of transistors	754 million	35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology	65 nm	4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	285 Watt
Texture fill rate	24.00	626.4
Floating-point processing power	0.24 TFLOPS	40.09 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	80
TMUs	48	240
Tensor Cores	no data	240
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	60

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	MXM-HE	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	285 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 16-pin
SLI options	+	-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3	GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	12 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	800 MHz	1313 MHz
Memory bandwidth	51.2 GB/s	504.2 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI	-	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.1 (10_0)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	4.0	6.7
OpenGL	3.3	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	3.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.3
CUDA	1.1	8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

8800M GTX 1.20

RTX 4070 Ti 82.48
+6773%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

8800M GTX 462

RTX 4070 Ti 31829
+6789%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

8800M GTX 3422

RTX 4070 Ti 135624
+3863%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	3−4 −7667%	233 +7667%
1440p	2−3 −7650%	155 +7650%
4K	1−2 −9200%	93 +9200%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	3.43
1440p	no data	5.15
4K	no data	8.59

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

3−4

−7767%

236
+7767%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −3260%	160−170 +3260%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −2900%	120−130 +2900%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −7167%	218 +7167%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −11700%	110−120 +11700%
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4 −6600%	200−210 +6600%
Forza Horizon 4	1−2 −25300%	250−260 +25300%
Hitman 3	6−7 −2050%	120−130 +2050%
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16 −1986%	290−300 +1986%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3 −6100%	120−130 +6100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8−9 −4425%	350−400 +4425%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −381%	150−160 +381%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −3260%	160−170 +3260%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −2900%	120−130 +2900%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −6067%	185 +6067%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −11700%	110−120 +11700%
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4 −6600%	200−210 +6600%
Forza Horizon 4	1−2 −25300%	250−260 +25300%
Hitman 3	6−7 −2050%	120−130 +2050%
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16 −1986%	290−300 +1986%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3 −6100%	120−130 +6100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8−9 −5813%	473 +5813%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−12 −1573%	180−190 +1573%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −381%	150−160 +381%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −3260%	160−170 +3260%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −2900%	120−130 +2900%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −5467%	167 +5467%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −11700%	110−120 +11700%
Forza Horizon 4	1−2 −25300%	250−260 +25300%
Hitman 3	6−7 −2050%	120−130 +2050%
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16 −2407%	351 +2407%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8−9 −5025%	410 +5025%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−12 −1918%	222 +1918%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −375%	152 +375%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−6100%

120−130
+6100%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2 −16500%	160−170 +16500%
Far Cry New Dawn	2−3 −5500%	110−120 +5500%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −9900%	100−105 +9900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	0−1	80−85
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −10400%	105 +10400%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −8300%	80−85 +8300%
Hitman 3	7−8 −1629%	120−130 +1629%
Horizon Zero Dawn	4−5 −6725%	273 +6725%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	0−1	150−160
Watch Dogs: Legion	5−6 −4700%	240−250 +4700%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

4−5

−3050%

120−130
+3050%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn

0−1

65−70

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −7100%	70−75 +7100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −6900%	70−75 +6900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	0−1	50−55
Far Cry 5	0−1	50−55

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−4900%

100−105
+4900%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	150−160 +0%	150−160 +0%
Battlefield 5	240−250 +0%	240−250 +0%
Metro Exodus	150−160 +0%	150−160 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	150−160 +0%	150−160 +0%
Battlefield 5	240−250 +0%	240−250 +0%
Metro Exodus	150−160 +0%	150−160 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla

150−160

+0%

150−160

+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	270−280 +0%	270−280 +0%
Metro Exodus	148 +0%	148 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	280 +0%	280 +0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	85−90 +0%	85−90 +0%
Hitman 3	75−80 +0%	75−80 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	220−230 +0%	220−230 +0%
Metro Exodus	140−150 +0%	140−150 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	149 +0%	149 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	48 +0%	48 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	160−170 +0%	160−170 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	140 +0%	140 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	68 +0%	68 +0%

This is how 8800M GTX and RTX 4070 Ti compete in popular games:

RTX 4070 Ti is 7667% faster in 1080p
RTX 4070 Ti is 7650% faster in 1440p
RTX 4070 Ti is 9200% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RTX 4070 Ti is 25300% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

RTX 4070 Ti is ahead in 47 tests (70%)
there's a draw in 20 tests (30%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	1.20	82.48
Recency	1 November 2007	3 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	12 GB
Chip lithography	65 nm	4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	285 Watt

8800M GTX has 338.5% lower power consumption.

RTX 4070 Ti, on the other hand, has a 6773.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 15 years, a 2300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1525% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 8800M GTX in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 8800M GTX is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.