GeForce GT 710 vs 8800M GTX SLI

#ad 
Buy
8200M G 8200M G mGPU AMD 8200M G mGPU Intel 8400M G 8400M GS 8400M GT 8600M GS 8600M GT 8600M GT Mac Edition 8600M GT SLI 8700M GT 8700M GT SLI 8800M GTS 8800M GTX 8800M GTX SLI
VS
#ad 
Buy
GT 630 Rev. 2 GT 630 Rev. 2 PCIe x8 GT 635 OEM GT 640 Rev. 2 GT 710

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 8800M GTX SLI with GeForce GT 710, including specs and performance data.

8800M GTX SLI
2007
512 MB GDDR3, 130 Watt
1.77
+26.4%

8800M GTX SLI outperforms GT 710 by a significant 26% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

8800M GTX SLI 8800M GTX SLI
GT 710 GT 710

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking892967
Place by popularitynot in top-10063
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.04
Power efficiency1.085.86
ArchitectureG9x (2007−2010)Kepler 2.0 (2013−2015)
GPU code nameNB8E-GTXGK208
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date19 November 2007 (17 years ago)27 March 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$34.99

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192192
Core clock speed500 MHz954 MHz
Number of transistors1508 Million915 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt19 Watt
Maximum GPU temperatureno data95 °C
Texture fill rateno data15.26
Floating-point processing powerno data0.3663 TFLOPS
ROPsno data8
TMUsno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportno dataPCI Express 2.0
Interfaceno dataPCIe 2.0 x8
Lengthno data145 mm
Heightno data2.713" (6.9 cm)
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR3
Maximum RAM amount512 MB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz1.8 GB/s
Memory bandwidthno data14.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataDual Link DVI-DHDMIVGA
Multi monitor supportno data3 displays
HDMI-+
HDCP-+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
Audio input for HDMIno dataInternal

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Vision-+
PureVideo-+
PhysX-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1012 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno data4.5
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.1.126
CUDA-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD10−12
+25%
8
−25%
1440p3−4
+0%
3
+0%
4K8−9
+14.3%
7
−14.3%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data4.37
1440pno data11.66
4Kno data5.00

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Counter-Strike 2 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Battlefield 5 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Counter-Strike 2 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−150%
5
+150%
Fortnite 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
Valorant 35−40
+8.3%
35−40
−8.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Battlefield 5 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Counter-Strike 2 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 35−40
+18.2%
30−35
−18.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Dota 2 21−24
+5%
20
−5%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−100%
4
+100%
Fortnite 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 4−5
−125%
9
+125%
Metro Exodus 3−4
+0%
3
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+40%
5
−40%
Valorant 35−40
+8.3%
35−40
−8.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Dota 2 21−24
+16.7%
18
−16.7%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−100%
4
+100%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+133%
3
−133%
Valorant 35−40
+8.3%
35−40
−8.3%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%
Grand Theft Auto V 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+28.6%
14−16
−28.6%
Valorant 14−16
+75%
8−9
−75%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 4−5
−75%
7
+75%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

This is how 8800M GTX SLI and GT 710 compete in popular games:

  • 8800M GTX SLI is 25% faster in 1080p
  • A tie in 1440p
  • 8800M GTX SLI is 14% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the 8800M GTX SLI is 133% faster.
  • in Far Cry 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GT 710 is 150% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • 8800M GTX SLI is ahead in 34 tests (71%)
  • GT 710 is ahead in 5 tests (10%)
  • there's a draw in 9 tests (19%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 1.77 1.40
Recency 19 November 2007 27 March 2014
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 19 Watt

8800M GTX SLI has a 26.4% higher aggregate performance score.

GT 710, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 132.1% more advanced lithography process, and 584.2% lower power consumption.

The GeForce 8800M GTX SLI is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 710 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 8800M GTX SLI is a notebook card while GeForce GT 710 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTX SLI
GeForce 8800M GTX SLI
NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
GeForce GT 710
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

8800M GTX SLI GeForce 8800M GTX SLI
vs
R7 M365X Radeon R7 M365X
GT 710 GeForce GT 710
vs
ATI HD 2900 PRO Radeon HD 2900 PRO
8800M GTX SLI GeForce 8800M GTX SLI
vs
HD 8650M Radeon HD 8650M
GTX 480 GeForce GTX 480
vs
7600 GT GeForce 7600 GT
Quadro M620 Quadro M620
vs
9700M GTS GeForce 9700M GTS
ATI HD 4850 Radeon HD 4850
vs
FirePro M6000 FirePro M6000
ATI HD 4850 Radeon HD 4850
vs
FirePro M4000 FirePro M4000
ATI HD 4850 Radeon HD 4850
vs
S7100X FirePro S7100X
ATI HD 5670 Radeon HD 5670
vs
GeForce G210M GeForce G210M
ATI HD 5670 Radeon HD 5670
vs
RX 570X Radeon RX 570X
8800M GTX GeForce 8800M GTX
vs
ATI Mobility HD 2600 XT Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT
GT 220 GeForce GT 220
vs
ATI Mobility HD 5430 Mobility Radeon HD 5430
Go 7800 GTX GeForce Go 7800 GTX
vs
Go 6800 GeForce Go 6800

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3 3 votes

Rate GeForce 8800M GTX SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 4428 votes

Rate GeForce GT 710 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8800M GTX SLI or GeForce GT 710, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.