GeForce G210M vs ATI Radeon HD 5670

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 5670 with GeForce G210M, including specs and performance data.

ATI HD 5670
2010
1 GB GDDR5, 64 Watt
2.03
+515%

ATI HD 5670 outperforms G210M by a whopping 515% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking8861316
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.26no data
Power efficiency2.231.66
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameRedwoodGT218
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date14 January 2010 (15 years ago)15 June 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$119 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40016
Core clock speed775 MHz625 MHz
Number of transistors627 million260 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)64 Watt14 Watt
Texture fill rate15.505.000
Floating-point processing power0.62 TFLOPS0.048 TFLOPS
Gigaflopsno data72
ROPs84
TMUs208

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCI-E 2.0
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount1 GBUp to 1 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHzUp to 500 (DDR2), Up to 800 (DDR3), Up to 800 (GDDR3) MHz
Memory bandwidth64 GB/s12.8 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGADual Link DVIDisplayPortHDMISingle Link DVIVGA
Multi monitor supportno data+
HDMI++
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Power managementno data8.0

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)11.1 (10_1)
Shader Model5.04.1
OpenGL4.42.1
OpenCL1.21.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

ATI HD 5670 2.03
+515%
GeForce G210M 0.33

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI HD 5670 800
+525%
GeForce G210M 128

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

ATI HD 5670 6584
+545%
GeForce G210M 1021

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p26
+550%
4−5
−550%
Full HD33
+106%
16
−106%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.61no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Battlefield 5 5−6 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Far Cry 5 2−3 0−1
Fortnite 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+233%
3−4
−233%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
+57.1%
7−8
−57.1%
Valorant 35−40
+50%
24−27
−50%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Battlefield 5 5−6 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 40−45
+186%
14
−186%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Dota 2 21−24
+120%
10−11
−120%
Far Cry 5 2−3 0−1
Fortnite 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+233%
3−4
−233%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 4−5 0−1
Metro Exodus 3−4 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
+57.1%
7−8
−57.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Valorant 35−40
+50%
24−27
−50%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Dota 2 21−24
+120%
10−11
−120%
Far Cry 5 2−3 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+233%
3−4
−233%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
+57.1%
7−8
−57.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Valorant 35−40
+50%
24−27
−50%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 2−3 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 12−14
+550%
2−3
−550%
Grand Theft Auto V 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
+600%
2−3
−600%
Valorant 14−16
+650%
2−3
−650%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 3−4 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 3−4 0−1

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 2−3 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 4−5 0−1
Far Cry 5 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%

This is how ATI HD 5670 and GeForce G210M compete in popular games:

  • ATI HD 5670 is 550% faster in 900p
  • ATI HD 5670 is 106% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the ATI HD 5670 is 600% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • ATI HD 5670 is ahead in 32 tests (97%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (3%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.03 0.33
Recency 14 January 2010 15 June 2009
Power consumption (TDP) 64 Watt 14 Watt

ATI HD 5670 has a 515.2% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 6 months.

GeForce G210M, on the other hand, has 357.1% lower power consumption.

The Radeon HD 5670 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce G210M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 5670 is a desktop card while GeForce G210M is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 5670
Radeon HD 5670
NVIDIA GeForce G210M
GeForce G210M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 459 votes

Rate Radeon HD 5670 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 84 votes

Rate GeForce G210M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 5670 or GeForce G210M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.