GeForce 9100M G vs 8800M GTX SLI

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 8800M GTX SLI and GeForce 9100M G, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

8800M GTX SLI
2007
512 MB GDDR3, 130 Watt
1.90
+850%

8800M SLI outperforms 9100M G by a whopping 850% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking9491456
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.12no data
ArchitectureG9x (2007−2010)no data
GPU code nameNB8E-GTXMCP77MH MCP79MH
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date19 November 2007 (18 years ago)3 June 2008 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1928
Core clock speed500 MHz450 MHz
Number of transistors1508 Millionno data
Manufacturing process technology65 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)130 Wattno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3no data
Maximum RAM amount512 MBno data
Memory bus width256 Bitno data
Memory clock speed800 MHzno data
Shared memory-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1010

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 3−4 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 5−6 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 3−4 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Far Cry 5 5−6 0−1
Fortnite 8−9 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+233%
3−4
−233%
Forza Horizon 5 4−5 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
+57.1%
7−8
−57.1%
Valorant 35−40
+56%
24−27
−56%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 5−6 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 3−4 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 40−45
+233%
12−14
−233%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Dota 2 21−24
+133%
9−10
−133%
Far Cry 5 5−6 0−1
Fortnite 8−9 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+233%
3−4
−233%
Forza Horizon 5 4−5 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 3−4 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Metro Exodus 3−4 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
+57.1%
7−8
−57.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
Valorant 35−40
+56%
24−27
−56%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 5−6 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Dota 2 21−24
+133%
9−10
−133%
Far Cry 5 5−6 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+233%
3−4
−233%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
+57.1%
7−8
−57.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
Valorant 35−40
+56%
24−27
−56%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 8−9 0−1

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 14−16
+1300%
1−2
−1300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+850%
2−3
−850%
Valorant 12−14
+1200%
1−2
−1200%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 3−4 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Hogwarts Legacy 2−3 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 3−4 0−1

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+7.1%
14−16
−7.1%
Valorant 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%

4K
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 4−5 0−1
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the 8800M GTX SLI is 850% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, 8800M GTX SLI surpassed 9100M G in all 30 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.90 0.20
Recency 19 November 2007 3 June 2008

8800M GTX SLI has a 850% higher aggregate performance score.

9100M G, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 months.

The GeForce 8800M GTX SLI is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9100M G in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTX SLI
GeForce 8800M GTX SLI
NVIDIA GeForce 9100M G
GeForce 9100M G

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 3 votes

Rate GeForce 8800M GTX SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 22 votes

Rate GeForce 9100M G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8800M GTX SLI or GeForce 9100M G, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.