Radeon RX 590 vs GeForce 8800 Ultra

Place in the ranking	947	232
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.02	24.61
Power efficiency	0.67	9.62
Architecture	Tesla (2006−2010)	GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code name	G80	Polaris 30
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	2 May 2007 (17 years ago)	15 November 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$829	$279

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 590 has 122950% better value for money than 8800 Ultra.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	612	2304
Core clock speed	612 MHz	1469 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1545 MHz
Number of transistors	681 million	5,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	90 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	171 Watt	175 Watt
Texture fill rate	39.17	222.5
Floating-point processing power	0.3871 TFLOPS	7.119 TFLOPS
ROPs	24	32
TMUs	32	144

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 1.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	270 mm	241 mm
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	2x 6-pin	1x 8-pin
SLI options	+	-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	8 GB
Memory bus width	384 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1080 MHz	2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	103.7 GB/s	256.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	2x DVI, 1x S-Video	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI	-	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.1 (10_0)	12 (12_0)
Shader Model	4.0	6.4
OpenGL	3.3	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	2.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.2.131
CUDA	+	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

8800 Ultra 1.67

RX 590 24.42
+1362%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

8800 Ultra 642

RX 590 9387
+1362%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	6−7 −1600%	102 +1600%
1440p	4−5 −1425%	61 +1425%
4K	2−3 −1750%	37 +1750%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	138.17 −4951%	2.74 +4951%
1440p	207.25 −4431%	4.57 +4431%
4K	414.50 −5397%	7.54 +5397%

RX 590 has 4951% lower cost per frame in 1080p
RX 590 has 4431% lower cost per frame in 1440p
RX 590 has 5397% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	87 +0%	87 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	137 +0%	137 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%
Metro Exodus	88 +0%	88 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	91 +0%	91 +0%
Valorant	128 +0%	128 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	129 +0%	129 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%
Dota 2	52 +0%	52 +0%
Far Cry 5	75−80 +0%	75−80 +0%
Fortnite	116 +0%	116 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	114 +0%	114 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	79 +0%	79 +0%
Metro Exodus	60 +0%	60 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	239 +0%	239 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	39 +0%	39 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	75−80 +0%	75−80 +0%
Valorant	64 +0%	64 +0%
World of Tanks	250−260 +0%	250−260 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	71 +0%	71 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%
Dota 2	80−85 +0%	80−85 +0%
Far Cry 5	75−80 +0%	75−80 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	100 +0%	100 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	79 +0%	79 +0%
Valorant	110 +0%	110 +0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 +0%	170−180 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	25 +0%	25 +0%
World of Tanks	160−170 +0%	160−170 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
Far Cry 5	70−75 +0%	70−75 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	70 +0%	70 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Metro Exodus	58 +0%	58 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Valorant	75 +0%	75 +0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
Dota 2	41 +0%	41 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	41 +0%	41 +0%
Metro Exodus	19 +0%	19 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	82 +0%	82 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	16 +0%	16 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	41 +0%	41 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	30 +0%	30 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
Dota 2	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Far Cry 5	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Fortnite	34 +0%	34 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	40 +0%	40 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
Valorant	39 +0%	39 +0%

This is how 8800 Ultra and RX 590 compete in popular games:

RX 590 is 1600% faster in 1080p
RX 590 is 1425% faster in 1440p
RX 590 is 1750% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

there's a draw in 64 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	1.67	24.42
Recency	2 May 2007	15 November 2018
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	8 GB
Chip lithography	90 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	171 Watt	175 Watt

8800 Ultra has 2.3% lower power consumption.

RX 590, on the other hand, has a 1362.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 650% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 590 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 8800 Ultra in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.