GeForce GTX 460 768MB vs 8800 Ultra

#ad 
Buy
8800 GTS 320 8800 GTS 640 8800 GTS Core 112 8800 GTX 8800 Ultra
VS
#ad 
Buy
GTX 460 GTX 460 768MB GTX 460 OEM GTX 460 SE GTX 460 SE v2 GTX 460 v2 GTX 460 v2 ES GTX 460 X2

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 8800 Ultra and GeForce GTX 460 768MB, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

8800 Ultra
2007
512 MB GDDR3, 171 Watt
1.44

GTX 460 768MB outperforms 8800 Ultra by a whopping 160% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

8800 Ultra 8800 Ultra
GTX 460 768MB GTX 460 768MB

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking959692
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.02no data
Power efficiency0.67no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameG80no data
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date2 May 2007 (17 years ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$829 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores612336
Core clock speed612 MHz675 MHz
Number of transistors681 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology90 nmno data
Power consumption (TDP)171 Wattno data
Texture fill rate39.17no data
Floating-point processing power0.3871 TFLOPSno data
ROPs24no data
TMUs32no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16no data
Length270 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinno data
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount512 MBno data
Memory bus width384 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1080 MHz1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth103.7 GB/sno data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Videono data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)11
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL3.3no data
OpenCL1.1no data
VulkanN/A-
CUDA+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD18−20
−161%
47
+161%

Cost per frame, $

1080p46.06no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Battlefield 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Fortnite 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Valorant 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Battlefield 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Dota 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Fortnite 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 15
+0%
15
+0%
Metro Exodus 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Dota 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Metro Exodus 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Valorant 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Valorant 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

This is how 8800 Ultra and GTX 460 768MB compete in popular games:

  • GTX 460 768MB is 161% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 58 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 1.44 3.74

GTX 460 768MB has a 159.7% higher aggregate performance score.

The GeForce GTX 460 768MB is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 8800 Ultra in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce 8800 Ultra
GeForce 8800 Ultra
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 768MB
GeForce GTX 460 768MB
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

8800 Ultra GeForce 8800 Ultra
vs
ATI HD 2900 XT Radeon HD 2900 XT
GTX 460 768MB GeForce GTX 460 768MB
vs
R7 250E Radeon R7 250E
8800 Ultra GeForce 8800 Ultra
vs
ATI HD 2900 PRO Radeon HD 2900 PRO
GTX 1080 11Gbps GeForce GTX 1080 11Gbps
vs
9600 GT GeForce 9600 GT
505 OEM GeForce 505 OEM
vs
9600 GT GeForce 9600 GT
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
vs
9600 GT GeForce 9600 GT
GT 530 OEM GeForce GT 530 OEM
vs
8800 GTS 512 GeForce 8800 GTS 512
RX 7650 GRE Radeon RX 7650 GRE
vs
8400 GS Rev. 2 GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2
UHD Graphics 730 UHD Graphics 730
vs
8300 GS GeForce 8300 GS
RTX 3050 8 GB GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB
vs
8400 GS GeForce 8400 GS
GT 705 OEM GeForce GT 705 OEM
vs
8400 GS PCI GeForce 8400 GS PCI
RTX 4060 AD106 GeForce RTX 4060 AD106
vs
8600 GS GeForce 8600 GS
ATI Mobility X1400 Mobility Radeon X1400
vs
8600 GT GeForce 8600 GT

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.2 30 votes

Rate GeForce 8800 Ultra on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 100 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 460 768MB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8800 Ultra or GeForce GTX 460 768MB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.