ATI FireGL V7600 vs GeForce 8800 Ultra

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1014not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.02no data
Power efficiency0.69no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameG80R600
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date2 May 2007 (18 years ago)6 November 2007 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$829 $999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores612240
Core clock speed612 MHz600 MHz
Number of transistors681 million720 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)171 Watt127 Watt
Texture fill rate39.177.200
Floating-point processing power0.3871 TFLOPS0.288 TFLOPS
ROPs2412
TMUs3212
L2 Cache96 KB128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length270 mm254 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pin1x 8-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount512 MB512 MB
Memory bus width384 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1080 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth103.7 GB/s51.2 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)10.0 (10_0)
Shader Model4.04.0
OpenGL3.33.3
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 May 2007 6 November 2007
Chip lithography 90 nm 80 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 171 Watt 127 Watt

ATI FireGL V7600 has an age advantage of 6 months, a 13% more advanced lithography process, and 35% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 8800 Ultra and FireGL V7600. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 8800 Ultra is a desktop graphics card while FireGL V7600 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 35 votes

Rate GeForce 8800 Ultra on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 1 vote

Rate FireGL V7600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8800 Ultra or FireGL V7600, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.