GeForce 8800 Ultra vs ATI FireGL V7700

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated946
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.02
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameRV670G80
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date19 November 2007 (16 years ago)2 May 2007 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$899 $829

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores320128
CUDA coresno data612
Core clock speed777 MHz612 MHz
Number of transistors666 million681 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data171 Watt
Texture fill rate12.4339.17
Floating-point processing power0.4973 TFLOPS0.3871 TFLOPS
ROPs1624
TMUs1632

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length254 mm270 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin2x 6-pin
SLI options-+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR4GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount512 MB512 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed2252 MHz1080 MHz
Memory bandwidth72.06 GB/s103.7 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model4.14.0
OpenGL3.33.3
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 19 November 2007 2 May 2007
Chip lithography 55 nm 90 nm

ATI FireGL V7700 has an age advantage of 6 months, and a 63.6% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FireGL V7700 and GeForce 8800 Ultra. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FireGL V7700 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce 8800 Ultra is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI FireGL V7700
FireGL V7700
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 Ultra
GeForce 8800 Ultra

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate FireGL V7700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 28 votes

Rate GeForce 8800 Ultra on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.