ATI FirePro V9800 vs GeForce 8800 Ultra

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1014not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.02no data
Power efficiency0.69no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameG80Cypress
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date2 May 2007 (18 years ago)9 September 2010 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$829 $3,499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6121600
Core clock speed612 MHz850 MHz
Number of transistors681 million2,154 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)171 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate39.1768.00
Floating-point processing power0.3871 TFLOPS2.72 TFLOPS
ROPs2432
TMUs3280
L1 Cacheno data160 KB
L2 Cache96 KB512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length270 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pin1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount512 MB4 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1080 MHz1150 MHz
Memory bandwidth103.7 GB/s147.2 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model4.05.0
OpenGL3.34.4
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 May 2007 9 September 2010
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 171 Watt 250 Watt

8800 Ultra has 46% lower power consumption.

ATI V9800, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 125% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 8800 Ultra and FirePro V9800. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 8800 Ultra is a desktop graphics card while FirePro V9800 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 35 votes

Rate GeForce 8800 Ultra on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 19 votes

Rate FirePro V9800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8800 Ultra or FirePro V9800, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.