GeForce 9100M G mGPU vs 8800 GTS 112

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameG80C77
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date19 November 2007 (18 years ago)29 July 2008 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores11216
Core clock speed500 MHz450 MHz
Number of transistors681 million210 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt12 Watt
Texture fill rate28.001.800
Floating-point processing power0.2688 TFLOPS0.0352 TFLOPS
ROPs204
TMUs284
L2 Cache80 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount640 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width320 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed800 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth64 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model4.04.0
OpenGL3.33.3
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 19 November 2007 29 July 2008
Chip lithography 90 nm 80 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 12 Watt

9100M G mGPU has an age advantage of 8 months, a 12.5% more advanced lithography process, and 1150% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 and GeForce 9100M G mGPU AMD. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 is a desktop graphics card while GeForce 9100M G mGPU AMD is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112
GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112
NVIDIA GeForce 9100M G mGPU AMD
GeForce 9100M G mGPU AMD

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.1 309 votes

Rate GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce 9100M G mGPU AMD on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 or GeForce 9100M G mGPU AMD, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.